Connect with us

Politics

Yahaya Bello’s name not on N550m Abuja property documents – EFCC witness tells court

Published

on

The Federal High Court, Abuja, was on Monday told that a former governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, did not participate in all the transactions that led to purchase of N550 million property in the Maitama area of Abuja by one Shehu Bello.

The court was also informed that Bello’s name never featured in all documents relating to transactions including the title deed.

A witness of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Olusegun Joseph Adeleke gave the evidence while testifying in the money laundering charges against the former governor.

Adeleke who is the General Manager of EFAB Properties Limited, was led I in evidence by EFCC lead counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN.

He had narrated to Justice Emeka Nwite how the Chairman of EFAB properties Limited, Fabian Nwora, invited him to meetings with Shehu Bello on the purchase of the property located at No 1, Ikogosi street in Maitama Abuja.

Giving an account of what transpired, he said sometime in 2020, his chairman, Chief Fabian Nwora, introduced him to a young man called Shehu Bello and that they had a discussion concerning the purchase of the property.

“We had a discussion concerning the purchase of the property in question. And he told me that the young man would be coming back to make payment for the property at an agreed price of N550 million,” he said.

When asked if he had seen Shehu Bello since that day, he said, “I saw him three times. The first time was for introduction, the second time for payment and the third time was when he brought a legal document for the execution of the EFAB property.”

The EFCC lawyer then mentioned another property at 5th Avenue in Gwarinpa and told the witness to tell the court what he knows about it.

Responding, the witness said the property was purchased by one Nuhu Mohammed for N70 million and was paid for through a bank transfer.

He was asked if he remembered which bank the money came from, but he said no.

The EFCC witness explained that upon conclusion of transactions, Shehu Bello made payment for the property and receipt and letter of allocation delivered to him.

He however said that the said Shehu Bello changed the transactions when he came back for refund of his money upon discovery that the house was under EFCC investigation.

Under cross examination by Joseph Bodunde Daudu, SAN, lead counsel to Yahaya Bello, the witness admitted having transactions with Shehu Bello three times.

He said that throughout the transactions, he did not sight Yahaya Bello while his name did also not feature in any of the documents on the transactions including the title deed.

The witness said that he didn’t see Shehu Bello who purchased the property in court.

Asked if the witness’ actions were purely based on the instructions of his chairman. He responded, “Yes.”

The defence counsel further asked whether it was correct to say that he did not initiate any discussion with Shehu Bello on his own, to which he also answered, “Yes.”

On the documents signed for the transactions, the defendant’s counsel asked the witness if he could confirm that Shehu Bello signed his own part in his presence.

“He did not my Lord,” he answered.

Daudu also asked: “Throughout this transaction, did you set eye on the defendant?”

“Not at anytime in the course of this transaction,” the witness responded.

He was also asked if the name of the defendant appeared anywhere on the documents he said were with the EFCC.

He, again, answered, “no!”
The prosecution then told the court that they had another witness to call, on subpoena.

The defendant’s counsel objected that they were being taken by surprise but added that he had no intention of stalling the trial.

The second witness identified herself as Williams Abimbola, a compliance officer with the United Bank for Africa Plc (UBA).

She had the subpoena with her, which the lawyer sought to tender as evidence.

The Dldefendant’s counsel had no objection and it was marked “Exhibit 1”.

The witness read out the documents the subpoena asked for to include the statement of account of Kogi State Government House, from January 1, 2016 to January 31, 2024.

The statement of account of Maselina Njoku, from January 1 to December 31, 2022, were also admitted in evidence, including the account opening packages of American International School and it’s statement of accounts, from September 1 to September 30, 2020.

Meanwhile, the case been adjourned to March 6 and 7 for continuation of trial.

Politics

Rivers ADC Primaries: Farah Dagogo emerges Rivers ADC Governorship candidate

Published

on

Former member of the House of Representatives, Farah Dagogo, has emerged as the governorship candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Rivers State ahead of the 2027 governorship election.

Dagogo secured victory in the party’s direct primary polling 64,700 votes to defeat his closest challenger, Sokonte Davies, who garnered 9,050 votes.

The result was announced by the Chairman of the ADC Rivers State Governorship Primary Electoral Committee, Agu Bryan, alongside other committee members and representatives of the Independent National Electoral Commission.

Continue Reading

Politics

APC Southeast hails successful State Assembly primaries

Published

on

 

…Commends Uzodimma’s leadership

The Southeast Executive Committee of the All Progressives Congress (APC), has expressed deep appreciation to the party’s elected officials, stakeholders, and members for their unwavering support that made the State Houses of Assembly Primary Election a resounding success.

Speaking on behalf of the Southeast Executive Committee, the party’s National Vice Chairman, Southeast, Dr. Ijeomah Arodiogbu, specifically thanked Imo State Governor Senator Hope Uzodimma, who serves as the leader of the party in the region, for his guidance.

He commended the governor for his consistent support that guaranteed peaceful and successful primaries, and noted that his leadership provided the necessary framework for harmony, encouraging all participants to prioritize collective progress over individual interests.

Dr. Arodiogbu further congratulated all winners of the primaries, urging them to embrace humility in victory.

He emphasized the importance of remaining grounded as the party works to consolidate its achievements and prepare effectively for the 2027 general elections.

He also reiterated APC’s commitment to inclusive participation and strategic planning across the Southeast and said that with these successful primaries, the party signals readiness to build on its foundation, delivering impactful representation and addressing the needs of citizens in the zone.

The primaries held smoothly across the five states of the Southeast geopolitical zone on Wednesday, May 20, 2026, reflecting strong unity and commitment within the party ranks.

This achievement underscored the growing strength of the APC in the region, where diligent coordination and collective efforts translated into orderly processes free from major disruptions.

Continue Reading

Politics

FEDERAL HIGH COURT STOPS INEC FROM RESTRICTING DEFECTION TO ANOTHER PARTY AFTER CONTESTING PRIMARY

Published

on

 

Here is the judgement from the Federal High Court, Abuja today

1. INEC can only monitor 2027 primaries but cannot fix timetable for when a political party should conduct its primaries for this election

2. INEC cannot give a shorter timeframe or abridge the period in which a political party can provide information of their candidates for 2027 election

3. INEC cannot give a shorter timeframe to political parties as regards withdrawal or replacement of candidates (Placeholders)

4. INEC cannot publish any final list of candidates for 2027 elections before 60 days to election.

5. INEC cannot fix 2027 campaigns to end 2 days to elections.

6. This is AN ORDER nullifying and setting aside the timeframes imposed by INEC for 2027 General Election for:

– the conduct of primary elections by political parties for the 2027 general elections

– the submission of personal particulars of candidates by their political parties for the 2027 general elections

– the withdrawal and replacement of candidates by political parties

– the publication of the final list of candidates for the 2027 general elections and campaigning.

Is this a trap or a game changer for some aspirants???

Continue Reading

Trending