Connect with us

News

Biafra: ‘Nnamdi Kanu is a prisoner of conscience, unlawfully detained’ – IPOB

Published

on

Nnamdi Kanu

The Indigenous People of Biafra has slammed what it described as the latest desperate attempt by the Federal Government and some sections of the media to divert public attention from the alleged disgraceful collapse of their case against its leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

IPOB, while describing Kanu as a prisoner of conscience, being unlawfully detained in violation of local and international law, accused the Federal Government of concocting and fabricating lies to nail him instead of reporting on the embarrassing cross-examination of their witness, known as PW-BBB, who admitted under oath that no investigation report exists to support the politically motivated charges.

According to a statement by its Media and Publicity Secretary, Emmanuel Powerful, titled “Federal Government’s Propaganda Fails Again,” the group rejects media diversion tactics with what it called the worthless death certificate of Ahmed Gulak.

IPOB stated further that the Federal Government was trying to link Gulak’s death to the group or Kanu, who knows nothing about it, in order to further delay the case.

“The Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, categorically condemns the latest desperate attempt by the Federal Government and its compromised media to divert public attention from the disgraceful collapse of their case against our leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

“Rather than report on the embarrassing cross-examination of their confused witness, known as PW-BBB, who admitted under oath that no investigation report exists to support the politically motivated charges, the media is awash with irrelevant stories about the tendering of a death certificate.

“Let it be known that the so-called death certificate of Ahmed Gulak, former aide to ex-President Jonathan, has no evidentiary value whatsoever in the context of the ongoing trial.

The Federal Government’s prosecuting counsel, Awomolo SAN, acting with shocking dishonesty, attempted to reintroduce evidence after closing his examination-in-chief—an unethical and unacceptable legal manoeuvre designed only to mask the shame of a failed prosecution.

“It is important to set the record straight: The sit-at-home observance declared by IPOB for the annual 30th May Remembrance Day in 2021 was held on Monday, 31st May 2021, not Sunday the 30th. Gulak was murdered on Sunday, a full day before the observance.

“This timeline alone dismantles the fabricated claim that IPOB had any involvement in his death. The attempt to retrofit this tragic event into their crumbling narrative is not just deceitful, but it is criminal.

“We remind the world that this is not the first time the Nigerian state has weaponised misinformation and historical revisionism to justify ethnic prosecution,” the statement read in part.

News

In Court Today: “Nnamdi Kanu’s Threats Mere Boasts, No Evidence of Criminality”

Published

on

Lead counsel for Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the banned Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Chief Kanu Agabi, told the Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday that his client’s threats of violence were empty boasts, not actionable offenses.

Addressing Justice James Omotosho while adopting the defense’s no-case submission, Agabi argued that the prosecution failed to prove any elements of the charges against Kanu. He accused the prosecution of merely portraying Kanu as a villain without evidence, noting that no witnesses testified to being incited by Kanu’s broadcasts.

 

“Kanu was simply boasting when he claimed he could ‘bring the world to a standstill.’ Boasting isn’t a crime, and prosecuting someone for it is unwarranted,” Agabi said.

 

He pointed to widespread insecurity across Nigeria, asserting that Kanu, like others, was concerned about it. Agabi referenced statements by DSS Director General Adeola Ajayi and former Defense Minister Theophilus Danjuma, who urged self-defense against attacks, arguing that Kanu’s call for people to protect themselves was similar and lawful.

 

Agabi criticized the prosecution’s evidence, including an unauthenticated #ENDSARS report and death reports submitted without medical experts for cross-examination. He noted that prosecution witnesses frequently responded with “I don’t remember” or “I don’t know” – 80 times, by his count – undermining the case’s credibility. He also highlighted that the prosecution failed to address 10 of the 40 points raised by the defense, arguing that even one unanswered issue warranted acquittal.

 

On Kanu’s detention, Agabi claimed that over six years of solitary confinement had affected his client’s mental state, violating international standards limiting such confinement to 15 days. He also challenged the legality of IPOB’s proscription, insisting it lacked presidential approval. “If they have proof of the president’s approval, let them produce it,” he said.

 

Agabi further argued that the court lacked jurisdiction over a charge related to an allegedly illegal imported transmitter, citing a prior Court of Appeal ruling.

 

In response, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, the prosecuting counsel, urged the court to dismiss the no-case submission and order Kanu to defend himself against terrorism charges. Awomolo argued that the prosecution provided ample evidence, including audio and video clips, to establish a prima facie case. He noted that Kanu admitted leading IPOB, a proscribed group, and making broadcasts inciting violence and destruction, which allegedly led to the deaths of over 170 security personnel.

 

Awomolo rejected the defense’s claim that Kanu’s broadcasts were mere boasts, arguing that statements causing public fear are illegal. “Boasting about killing security personnel and inciting violence isn’t a joke. Kanu must explain his actions,” he said.

 

Countering the defense’s claim of prolonged detention, Awomolo clarified that Kanu was arrested in 2015, granted bail in 2017, and had it revoked in 2022 after absconding. He attributed delays in the trial to the defense’s tactics, not the prosecution.

 

On IPOB’s proscription, Awomolo noted that the matter is before the Supreme Court, making it inappropriate for the trial court to rule on its validity.

 

Justice Omotosho adjourned the case to October 10 for a ruling on the no-case submission after hearing both sides.

Continue Reading

Business

Aisha Achimugu: Bank MD, compliance chief linked to alleged $12m laundering

Published

on

The first prosecution witness (PW1) in the trial of SunTrust Bank Managing Director, Halima Buba, and Chief Compliance Officer, Innocent Mbagwu, on Thursday, July 17, 2025, detailed before Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Abuja, how multi-million-dollar cash transactions were routed through him for transfers.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting both bank executives on a six-count charge bordering on money laundering to the tune of $12 million.

Led in evidence by prosecuting counsel, Ekele Iheanacho, SAN, the witness, a bureau de change operator, described multiple foreign exchange transactions involving the first defendant, Aisha Achimugu, and himself.

“Sometime in March 2025, I received a call from Aisha Achimugu that she had some forex transactions at SunTrust Bank branches in Abuja and Lagos. I called the first defendant, and she confirmed her knowledge of the transactions,” he testified.

On March 13, 2025, the witness said a staff of Achimugu, Iliya, visited SunTrust Bank Abuja for a $1 million cash swap, to be paid into Ocean Gate Energy Oil and Gas’ Zenith Bank account. The witness confirmed the transaction with the first defendant before arranging for the collection of the cash through intermediaries.

The witness further narrated, “Aisha told me she needed dollar inflows into her Ocean Gate Energy account to purchase an oil block. I got to know her in 2021 through the first defendant, and we met at SunTrust Bank.”

He added that the first defendant communicated transaction confirmations through WhatsApp, including screenshots of chats with the second defendant when he initially denied knowledge of the transactions.

According to the witness, “On March 13, 2025, Muktar Miko received a $2 million cash payment from the second defendant. Another $2 million was received on March 14, while on March 20, an additional $2 million was collected for cash swap transactions, all confirmed with the first defendant.”

On March 24, 2025, another $2 million was collected, with subsequent dollar inflows transferred in tranches into Ocean Gate Energy Oil and Gas’ Zenith Bank account after the swaps were completed.

The witness also testified that aside from the oil block purchase, Aisha Achimugu conducted further Naira-to-dollar exchange transactions, which he regularly confirmed with the first defendant, with Naira credited to local accounts and dollar equivalents transferred to Ocean Gate Energy.

The matter continues as the EFCC seeks to establish its case in the ongoing multi-million-dollar money laundering trial.

Continue Reading

News

President Goodluck Jonathan Second Wife.

Published

on

In an era where the personal lives of public figures are often on full display, one name has quietly commanded attention — Dr. (Mrs.) Ayima Lott Jonathan, also known as Lott J, the discreet and accomplished second wife of former Nigerian President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan.

Though largely unknown to the general public until recently, Dr. Lott Jonathan has remained a powerful figure behind the scenes. Her emergence into broader public consciousness followed the celebration of her recent academic milestone — the conferment of a Doctorate Degree, a testament to her intellectual commitment and professional distinction.

A legal practitioner by training, Lott J hails from a family of high repute. She is the daughter of Chief F.D. Lott, a respected legal luminary and former Attorney-General of Bayelsa State. Her deep-rooted heritage in public service and the law has undoubtedly influenced her poise, discretion, and leadership acumen.

Dr. Lott Jonathan is also a cousin to Diezani Alison-Madueke, the former Minister of Petroleum, making her a member of one of Nigeria’s most politically recognizable lineages.

She is not only the second wife of President Jonathan, but also the mother of his two sons, a fact that has remained largely private — until now. Her ability to maintain a life of quiet influence while contributing meaningfully to her family and society has sparked conversations around the value of discretion in a hyper-digital age.

Beyond her legal background and political ties, Dr. Lott Jonathan is an education entrepreneur. She is the founder and proprietor of Aduvie Montessori International, a prestigious private school located off Blantyre Street in Maitama, Abuja. The institution is widely regarded as one of the finest early learning academies in the Federal Capital Territory, drawing high-profile clientele and setting standards in quality education delivery.

Those close to her describe her as a woman of class, intelligence, and quiet strength. A role model for women who value substance over spotlight, Dr. Lott Jonathan exemplifies what it means to balance public significance with private dignity.

As photos of her circulate online, many Nigerians are reacting with admiration — not just for her beauty and accomplishments, but for how gracefully she has lived away from public drama while making impactful strides.

Her story is a reminder that in a world driven by constant visibility, it is still possible to live purposefully, powerfully, and privately.

 

Continue Reading

Trending