Connect with us

News

U.S. Officials Observe Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial In Abuja As Prosecution Witness Falters —IPOB

Published

on

IPOB said the presence of the U.S. observers “underscores the growing international concern over the manifestly unjust and politically motivated trial being orchestrated against our leader.”

Two officials from the United States government were present at the Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday, June 18, 2025, to observe the ongoing trial of the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, according to the organisation.

IPOB said the presence of the U.S. observers “underscores the growing international concern over the manifestly unjust and politically motivated trial being orchestrated against our leader.”

In a press statement issued after the hearing, and signed by Comrade Emma Powerful, Media and Publicity Secretary for IPOB, the organisation described the day’s court proceedings as a “shambolic” display by the prosecution, claiming that its principal witness, codenamed PW-DDD, crumbled under “devastating” cross-examination by the defence.

According to IPOB, the government’s witness, described as a self-identified law enforcement operative, gave testimony that “rested heavily on hearsay, uncorroborated newspaper clippings, and allegations lacking any investigative or evidentiary backbone.”

The group noted that PW-DDD relied on a July 3, 2021, Vanguard newspaper article to claim that Kanu had ordered someone to “kill 2,000 people.” He reportedly also alleged Kanu authorised the attack on the Owerri Correctional Facility but admitted under cross-examination that he was neither present at the incident nor involved in any formal investigation of it.

The presiding judge reportedly rejected documents the prosecution attempted to tender, ruling that they were obtained without legal counsel being present with the defendant—”in violation of fair trial standards,” IPOB said.

Among the exhibits submitted by the prosecution was a report from the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), which IPOB noted “simply stated that broadcasting transmitters require regulatory approval and that the equipment was ‘intended for broadcasting.’”

IPOB argued that such a statement is “neither novel nor incriminating in any serious legal sense.”

Highlighting the defence’s efforts, IPOB said its lead counsel, Dr. Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN, “utterly dismantled” the prosecution’s case during cross-examination.

PW-DDD allegedly admitted that “no official report of his so-called investigation was filed in court” and said it was “in a drawer in his office” instead. He also reportedly confirmed he had no personal knowledge of key individuals or events connected to the case.

“He never interviewed Uzomma Benjamin a.k.a. Onyearmy. He never interviewed the Vanguard journalist who allegedly took Onyearmy’s statement. He was not present at the Owerri Police Station or Correctional Centre during the alleged attacks,” the IPOB statement stated.

The witness also reportedly admitted to not interviewing anyone linked to the killing of a former presidential aide, Ahmed Gulak, and to receiving no witness information related to it.

When questioned about his reliance on newspaper reports, IPOB claimed he “shockingly affirmed that he believes everything he reads in newspapers,” but contradicted himself by dismissing a similar allegation involving Sunday Igboho published in the same outlet.

Under pressure from the defence, PW-DDD was allegedly made to read aloud a portion of the Vanguard article which labelled Onyearmy’s claims as “mere allegations without proof.”

According to IPOB, the witness gave “evasive and incoherent” answers throughout the session, prompting both the judge and the prosecution’s lead counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, to intervene.

The judge reportedly told the witness: “Answer the question put to you honestly without needless explanation and stop wasting my time.”

The witness replied that he would “chastise himself without the need for the court to admonish him.”

Summing up the court events, IPOB stated: “Today’s proceedings laid bare the comedy of errors that has become the Federal Government’s case against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.”

IPOB concluded the statement by renewing its call for the “immediate and unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu,” insisting that “this entire process is a political persecution anchored in illegality, impunity, and vengeance—not law.”

SaharaReporters earlier reported that the traditional ruler of Opi Ancient Kingdom in Nsukka Local Government Area, Enugu State, Eze-Igwe Williams Ezugwu, had declared that President Bola Tinubu missed a historic opportunity to begin national healing by failing to release Kanu on Democracy Day, June 12, 2025.

The monarch, who is also the Secretary General of the Conference of Nigeria Political Parties (CNPP), said Tinubu’s failure to act was “a missed opportunity to demonstrate statesmanship and empathy.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL FLAGS IMO “TIGER BASE,” VOWS PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGED RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.

Published

on

 

By Prince Uwalaka Chimaroke
14- DEC- 2025

Amnesty International has announced plans to make public, within the week, a comprehensive report detailing alleged human rights violations at the Tiger Base detention facility in Owerri, the Imo State capital. The organisation said its findings point to what it described as deep-rooted and disturbing practices that raise serious concerns about the conduct of security operations and the protection of fundamental rights.

Speaking on behalf of the organisation, the Country Director of Amnesty International in Nigeria, Isa Sanusi, stated that the group’s investigations, carried out over several months, uncovered accounts that suggest a pattern of abuse at the facility. He described the allegations as severe and warned that their implications extend beyond Imo State to Nigeria’s broader human rights reputation.

According to Sanusi, Amnesty International believes that the continued operation of facilities accused of such practices undermines public trust in the justice and security system. He stressed that the organisation is releasing its findings in the interest of transparency and public awareness, noting that citizens have a right to know how detention centres are being run.

The rights body also called on relevant authorities to respond promptly to the allegations, emphasizing the need for independent scrutiny and accountability where violations are established. Amnesty maintained that addressing such concerns decisively is essential to restoring confidence in law enforcement institutions.

Beyond the situation in Imo State, the organisation also commented on recent political developments in West Africa, including the attempted coup in the Benin Republic. Sanusi clarified that Amnesty’s position is not driven by political interests but by concern for the human rights consequences that often accompany military interventions and political instability.

He observed that military takeovers frequently result in the erosion of civil liberties and the suspension of democratic safeguards, adding that the recurring instability in the sub-region highlights the urgent need to strengthen democratic institutions and governance structures. According to him, democracy remains the most reliable framework for safeguarding human rights when it functions effectively and delivers justice to citizens.

Amnesty International further noted that it will continue to monitor developments in Benin and other parts of the region while sustaining its focus on domestic human rights issues in Nigeria. The organisation reiterated that the protection of human dignity must remain paramount, regardless of political or security challenges.

Sanusi concluded by stating that the forthcoming report on the Tiger Base facility should be seen as a call for introspection and reform, stressing that accountability within Nigeria is closely linked to the country’s standing and credibility on the international stage.

 

Continue Reading

News

UK Will Pay With Blood If It Doesn’t Take Putin’s WW3 Warning Serious – Ukrainian Major Warns (Details)

Published

on

A senior Ukrainian military officer has warned that Britain is dangerously unprepared for a major war and could pay a “high price” if Russian President Vladimir Putin expands the conflict in Ukraine to Europe.

Viktor Andrusiv, a major in the Ukrainian armed forces and former presidential adviser, said the UK must urgently learn from Ukraine’s experience before it is too late. His warning comes amid growing concern across NATO that Russia could escalate hostilities if diplomatic efforts fail.

Speaking against the backdrop of renewed calls by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte for Europe to prepare for war “like our grandparents endured,” Andrusiv said the greatest danger lies in disbelief. According to him, many people in Western countries still struggle to accept that large-scale war on European soil is a real possibility.

“The biggest problem is that people don’t believe this can happen,” Andrusiv said. He noted that Ukraine faced a similar mindset before Russia’s full-scale invasion, when the idea of tank columns and missile strikes seemed unthinkable in the 21st century.

Putin has recently warned that Russia is prepared to go to war with Europe if peace talks over Ukraine collapse, raising fears of a direct confrontation with NATO. Such a scenario would automatically draw in the UK under the alliance’s collective defence commitments.

British defence chiefs have already cautioned that the country’s armed forces have been “hollowed out” after decades of reduced military spending following the Cold War. Andrusiv agreed with that assessment, arguing that the UK’s military structure and equipment are outdated.

“I am sure you are not prepared,” he said. “That doesn’t mean you would lose for sure, but if you are not prepared, you will pay a higher price.”

Continue Reading

News

“Bandits Who Killed My Husband Threatening To Kill Me If I Dont Marry Their Leader” – Plateau Widow Cries Out For Help

Published

on

A young widow in Plateau State has raised the alarm over persistent death threats allegedly issued by terrorists who killed her husband and are now pressuring her to marry one of their leaders or risk being murdered alongside her children.

The woman, who identified herself simply as Nanbam, disclosed her ordeal on Friday during an interview with the international non-governmental organisation, Equipping the Persecuted. She said her husband was among 40 residents killed during a brutal attack on Mushere community in Bokkos Local Government Area in August.

According to Nanbam, the assailants stormed the village, surrounded residents and carried out mass killings. She alleged that her husband was gruesomely murdered, claiming that his attackers mutilated his body before disposing of it in a nearby pond.

She further revealed that shortly after the attack, the same group began contacting her, insisting that their leader wanted to marry her. Nanbam said the calls started on the very day her husband was killed, allegedly made using her late husband’s phone number.

“They told me their leader wanted to marry me,” she said, adding that she rejected the proposal outright, stating she would never marry someone responsible for killing her husband and the father of her children.

Nanbam alleged that since then, the threats have intensified, with the callers warning that she and her three children would be killed if she continued to refuse the marriage and decline conversion to Islam. She said the callers frequently use different phone numbers, making it difficult to block or trace them.

In a bid to escape the threats, the widow said she relocated to her hometown in Mangu Local Government Area. Despite changing her SIM card on the advice of family members, she said the calls resumed weeks later, with the callers claiming they had tracked her location and threatening to attack not only her but also her children and extended family members.

She described her situation as desperate, noting that she is still grieving her husband while struggling to raise her children alone amid constant fear for their lives.

Nanbam also alleged that her attempt to seek help from the police yielded no meaningful response. She claimed officers told her the callers could not be traced due to the use of multiple phone numbers and allegedly asked her to provide money to support tracking efforts, a request she said she could not afford.

“I don’t know where to run to anymore,”she lamented, appealing for urgent help and protection as she fears that her life and those of her children remain in imminent danger.

Continue Reading

Trending