Connect with us

Trending

Falana Faults Prolonged Detention Of Nigerian Blogger Ijele For Alleged Defamation Of Evangelist Ebuka Obi, Says High Court Lacks Jurisdiction

Published

on

SaharaReporters reports that Ijele’s case has been ongoing since April 2024, when he was detained at Ikoyi Prison in Lagos on allegations of cybercrime.

Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN) has faulted the continued detention of Chizorom Harrison Ofoegbu, popularly known as Ijele by Evangelist Ebuka Obi, the spiritual director of Zion Movement Outreach Ministry located in Lagos State.

 

SaharaReporters reports that Ijele’s case has been ongoing since April 2024, when he was detained at Ikoyi Prison in Lagos on allegations of cybercrime.

Despite meeting his bail conditions, his release has been hindered due to another case filed against him in Awka, Anambra State.

 

But reacting to the continued incarceration of the social media influencer, Falana explained that the Federal High Court has ruled that by the Community reading of Section 251 (1) (S), (3) of the CFRN and Section 7 (1) and (2) of the Federal High Court Act, it has no jurisdiction to try the offence of defamation.

According to the senior lawyer, the court also ruled that the offence of using social media handle to make online publications with the intention to cause hatred and damage the reputation of any person is no longer provided for under the existing law.

According to him, the court however ruled that it has jurisdiction to try the offence of cyberstalking vide online publication against the person of the evangelist which put him to fear of death under sections 24 (2) (c) (i) (ii) and (3) of the Act as amended.

 

He said, “The section provides for the offence of cyberstalking where a person knowingly or intentionally sends a message by means of computer systems or network that is pornography or which he knows to be false for the purpose of causing a breakdown of law and order, posing a threat to life or causing such message to be sent and where a person knowingly or intentionally transmits or causes the transmission of any communication through a computer system or network to bully, threaten or harass another person, where such communication places another person in fear of death, violence or bodily harm to another person.”

Count 1 of the charges against Ijele reads: “Conspiracy to commit the offence of using social media handle to make online publication with the intention to cause hatred and damage the reputation of the Evangelist which is not provided for under the existing law.”

Regarding this, Falana said, “It has been argued for the Defendant that the offence of using social media handle to make false online publication against the person of Evangelist Ebuka Obi, with the intention to cause hatred and damage to the reputation of the Evangelist is not known to law and that the Defendant cannot be accused of conspiring to commit a non-existent offence.

“No doubt, the alleged offence in Count one (1) of the Amended Charge is conspiracy to commit the offence of using social media handle to make online publication with the intention to cause hatred and damage the reputation of the Evangelist which is not provided for under the existing law.

“The alleged offence in Count one (1) of the Amended Charge is conspiracy to commit the offence of using social media handle to make online publication with the intention to cause hatred and damage the reputation of the Evangelist which is not provided for under the existing law.

“Section 24(1) (b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention etc.) Act, 2015 which mentions or talks about causing hatred has been amended in the 2024 Amendment where such words have been removed. The law is that one cannot be successfully accused of conspiracy to commit a principal offence that is non-existent.”

Falana further noted that on whether a person can be charged with conspiracy to commit an offence which is unknown to the law, the appellate court in Alao-Akala v. FRN (2021) LPELR – 56126 (CA) pp. 33-34, para F held as follows: “’What Section 22(4) of the I.C.P.C Act criminalized as an offence is award of contract without budget provision, approval and cash backing and not awarding contract without budget provision simpliciter. The offence the Appellant is charged with is unknown to the law.

“The Charge of conspiracy in this case cannot stand because what was alleged to have been agreed upon is not an offence under any law. Therefore, I am of the view that the Appellant cannot be lawfully and properly charged for conspiracy since no unlawful act was established and no agreement to do an illegal act was established by the Prosecution.

“On the footing of the foregoing, I hold that count one (1) in the Amended Charge is incompetent – Aluko J.’”

Count 2 reads: “Offence of Cyberstalking vide on-line publication against the person of the Evangelist which put him to fear of death.”

“’On Count 2, this relates to the offence of Cyberstalking vide on-line publication against the person of the Evangelist which put him to fear of death. This offence can well be placed within the provision of Section 24 (1) (a) (b) and 2(a) of the Cyber Crimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2015 (As Amended) 2024.

“’The above provision of the Act provides for the offence of Cyber stalking where a person knowingly or intentionally sends a message by means of   computer systems or network that is pornography or which he knows to be false for the purpose of causing a breakdown of law and order, posing a threat to life or causing such message to be sent and where a person knowingly or intentionally transmits or causes the transmission of any  communication through a computer system or network to bully, threaten  or harass another person, where such communication places another person in fear of death, violence or bodily harm to another person. The offence under Count 2 is punishable under sections 24 (2) (c) (i) (ii) and (3) of the Act,’ – Aluko J.

Regarding Count 3, he said, “On criminal allegation of defamation by publication with the intention to annoy, expose the Evangelist to hatred, contempt, ridicule, to disparage, lower his estimation and damage his reputation before the right thinking members of the public; offence was charged pursuant to Sections 373 and 374 of the Criminal Code Act.

 

“The main gist and summary of the offence under Count 3 of the Amended Charge is a criminal allegation of defamation by publication with the intention to annoy, expose the Evangelist to hatred, contempt, ridicule, to disparage, lower his estimation and damage his reputation before the right-thinking members of the public.

“I agree with the senior counsel that this offence particularly as it relates to defamation by whatever means is not one of the offences over which is court can exercise its criminal jurisdiction.

“Defamation is not one of the items over which jurisdiction is conferred on his Court vide Section 251(1) of CFRN or in respect of which the National Assembly can be said to have conferred this court with such jurisdiction.

“Therefore, by the Community reading of Section 251 (1) (S), (3) of the CFRN and Section 7 (1) and (2) of the Federal High Court Act, this Court has no jurisdiction to exercise over the offence of defamation.

“’Even in civil cases, there are a plethora of judicial pronouncements to the effect that this Court cannot exercise its jurisdiction over claims of torts of defamation. See Omon & Ors v. Ekpa (2019) LPELR – 47978 (CA) pp. 15 – 19, para A. To the extent of the foregoing, Count 3 in the Amended Charge is incompetent,’ – Aluko J.”

Trending

“I Was Handcuffed Like A Criminal” – Nigerian Soldier Who Was Dismissed For Asking Politicians’ Sons To Join Army Reveals (Video)

Published

on

A dismissed Nigerian soldier, Lance Corporal Rotimi Olamilekan, who was previously detained for criticising political leaders, has spoken out following his removal from the Nigerian Army, recounting what he described as months of suffering, humiliation, and deprivation of basic rights.

“I was arrested and dismissed as a Nigerian soldier because of a video I made last year, where I called on politicians’ children to join the military,” Olamilekan said in a video seen on Wednesday evening.

The dismissed soldier had previously gone viral after urging ministers, governors, lawmakers and local government chairmen to send their children to the battlefield, amid growing casualties among rank-and-file troops fighting insurgency.

In his latest narration, Olamilekan said he was arrested from his duty post and treated like a criminal.

“I was arrested because of a video I made, saying that ministers, governors, and local government chairmen, all politicians, should send their sons into the army to fight terrorists,” he said.

“This is the reason I was arrested. From my location, they handcuffed my legs and hands. It was as if I had stolen or killed.”

He explained that at the time of his arrest, he had been stationed in a remote bush location in the North-East for over four years.

“They moved me from there because I was inside the bush, and I had been there for about four years and nine months, staying in that location,” he added.

Olamilekan narrated how he was transferred across multiple detention facilities, including military formations in Borno State and Abuja.

“From there, they moved me to Maiduguri, 70th Provost MP Guard Room. From there, they took me to Abuja SIB. I was there for more than a month,” he said.

“They brought me back from Abuja to the 70th, then took me back to my location, and I was still locked up with handcuffs on my legs and hands, as if I had stolen something.”

According to him, he was later formally charged without being allowed to properly defend himself.

“They gave me a paper for my charges, four charges, but I will give details later because I can’t provide everything now,” he said.

“They called out my order and read the charges, the first, second, third, and fourth, and I was dismissed, dismissed from the regiment, just because of the video I made.”

He expressed shock at the outcome, describing it as evidence of a lack of free speech in Nigeria.

“I didn’t expect this. It shows that in our country, we don’t have freedom of speech, and we are not free to say the truth,” he lamented.

The dismissed soldier also alleged harsh and degrading treatment during his detention, particularly during his time in Abuja.

“I really suffered. I suffered a lot in Abuja, with handcuffs on my legs and hands for over a month,” he said.

“Even the feeding was just twice a day, small portions, not even up to N500 worth of food. No calls. I couldn’t talk to my family or anyone. They collected my phone.”

He added that after his dismissal, he was publicly disgraced and expelled from the barracks.

“It was after they dismissed me that they marched me out. I was dismissed from my unit and taken to the 7th Division. From there, they marched me out of the barracks as a dismissed soldier. It is so sad,” he said.

Olamilekan appealed to Nigerians and civil society groups to support his quest for justice.

“I don’t have anyone to fight for me, but I know God will fight for me because this is not right,” he said.

“Please, I want people to continue standing for me and help me fight for justice because I never expected this.”

Reflecting on his years of service, the dismissed soldier insisted he had maintained a clean record prior to the incident.

“I spent eight years in service. Since 2018, when I joined the army, I have never been charged until now because of social media,” he said.

“I have never fought anyone, never stolen, never killed, and never been involved in any misconduct. But because I spoke the truth on social media… I was dismissed.”

He further highlighted his prolonged deployment in Maiduguri without recognition or relief.

“I spent four years and nine months in Maiduguri, and nobody spoke about it or came to change my situation,” he said.

“I really suffered. They treated me badly… but no problem, glory be to God. Where there is life, there is hope.”

It had earlier been reported that Olamilekan was arrested on February 11, 2026, following a directive allegedly ordering his transfer to Army Headquarters in Abuja.

Sources had revealed that he was denied access to his family and legal representation during his detention.

In the earlier viral video that led to his arrest, Olamilekan had emotionally decried the loss of fellow soldiers on the battlefield and called on political leaders to show greater commitment by allowing their children to serve.

In the video posted on his Facebook page prior to his arrest, the soldier called on top government officials including ministers, senators, members of the House of Representatives, and local government chairmen to allow their sons to be recruited into the Nigerian Army to join the fight against banditry and insurgency across the country.

“The way I dey lose my colleagues, it is getting to things wey be say e dey comot tears for my eye day by day. In this country, we have 36 governors, we have like 109 senators, even ministers, we have like almost 60 (The way I keep losing my colleagues is reaching a point where it brings tears to my eyes every day. In this country, we have 36 governors, about 109 senators, nearly 60 ministers),” he said in Pidgin English.

“We have House of Representatives, chairmen of local governments – 774. Let each one of them bring their son to join the Nigerian Army (We have members of the House of Representatives, and 774 local government chairmen. Let each of them send their own son to join the Nigerian Army).”

Continue Reading

Trending

Kidnappers Took Loan With My Phone – Victim Recounts Ordeal

Published

on

A woman has shared a disturbing account of her abduction in Abuja, detailing how kidnappers allegedly exploited her personal information during captivity.

According to her, she was kidnapped while going home in a bus and kept blindfolded for two days as her captors demanded a ransom of ₦5 million from her family and friends.

She further alleged that while she was still in captivity, the abductors accessed her phone and used it to download a loan application.

With her ATM card and identification documents in her possession at the time, they reportedly secured a loan of ₦148,000 without her knowledge.

The victim said she remained unaware of the transaction throughout her ordeal, as she was blindfolded and focused on pleading for her life.

She revealed that when she later found out and wrote to the loan app, they insisted she must pay off the loan.

“I was kidnapped in a bus in Abuja. They blindfolded my eyes for two days. Even after asking for ransom of 5 million from my family and friends, they took a loan. They downloaded a loan app on my phone, and I always carry my ATM card and my ID cards in my bag, so they used it to up the loan app and took a loan of 148 thousand Naira. I didn’t even know about the loan all the time I was there cause I was blindfolded and just begging for my life….” she partly said.

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Man Ends His Marriage After Finding Photographs Of His Wife With Another Man While Browsing Google Maps

Published

on

A husband was left shocked and reportedly had to end his marriage after discovering photos of his wife with another man while using Google Maps.

The man was using Google Maps to plan a route before setting off on a journey when he noticed an image of his wife sitting on a bench, stroking the hair of another man whose head rested in her lap.

Captured by a Google camera vehicle in Lima, the Peruvian capital, the stunned husband said the photograph grabbed his attention because the woman pictured seemed to be wearing identical clothing to pieces his wife owned.

Although the photo dated back to 2013, the furious husband challenged his wife with proof of her previous betrayal.

The pair, whose identities remain anonymous, subsequently divorced after the woman confessed to having an affair.

In a twist of fate, she was photographed with her lover on a bench near the city’s Puente de los Suspiros de Barranco (Bridge of Sighs of the Ravine).

 

The husband recently posted the photographs on Facebook where they sparked considerable reaction amongst users.

One social media commenter, San Pateste, said: “What a small world it is… It would have been enough if she said to her husband that she did not love him any more.”

Guillermo Sanchez added: “Out of 100 women, 90 per cent are not loyal, the rest are loyal and only have one eye (hahaha) or are immortal (hahaha).”

Continue Reading

Trending