Yes you have the right to demand for DNA test since there is an established fact that you had something together coupled with the fact that the baby looks like you.

Haba

Get a lawyer to write the family officially informing them about the situation at hand and the need for DNA test to be conducted to reveal the truth.

If they refuse to honour the request

The lawyer can proceed to file a suit in that regard so the c0urt can come into the matter and give instruction that DNA should be conducted.

Once DNA reveals the child belongs to you.

The husband has the right to demand for everything he has spent on the child, those are payments he has evidence for only and you will have to pay them before you get access to the child.

If the child is still below 15

The mother may retain custody while you get access to visit and have the child visit you from time to time.

But the husband will know clearly now that he is not the father of the child.

And in the situation here the DNA result comes out negative that you are not the owner of the child.

You have nothing to fear cos the case was based on established fact not just assumptions and the c0urt is the one who handled the whole thing.

And no case of wrong accusation here or false claim so far you did not confront the family yourself

If they did not tell anyone
No one will hear about it

Ignorance of the law is no excuse

The Kano State Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has taken decisive disciplinary action against some of its judicial staff over misconduct, including the demotion of a registrar and the compulsory retirement of a senior court official.

This development was confirmed in a statement issued by Baba Jibo-Ibrahim, the spokesperson for the Kano State Judiciary, following the Commission’s 82nd meeting held earlier this week. The measures were based on findings presented by the Judiciary Public Complaints Committee (JPCC), which conducted thorough investigations into the reported allegations.

Registrar Salisu Sule was demoted by one grade level after he was found guilty of multiple infractions. The JPCC established that Sule had engaged in acts of intimidation, verbal abuse, and misuse of his position. Evidence showed that he repeatedly exploited the authority of the judiciary to harass citizens. A previous warning issued to him on December 19, 2024, did not result in corrective action, prompting the Commission to impose a more serious penalty.

In another case, Principal Registrar Ahmad Aliyu Danmaraya, serving at the High Court Headquarters in Kano, was retired compulsorily. The investigation revealed that he forged an affidavit, unlawfully applied the High Court’s stamp and seal, and inserted a fake receipt number, despite not being authorized as a commissioner for oaths.

Similarly, the Commission suspended Alkali Mustapha Kiru of the Sharia Court from judicial duties for one year. It was discovered that he prematurely closed a case due to the plaintiff’s failure to present a witness and then issued a writ of possession over a disputed piece of land. Furthermore, he allegedly detained the complainant unofficially for three weeks after the individual questioned his decision—an act that violated due process and principles of justice.

Meanwhile, Chief Magistrates Mustapha Sa’ad-Datti and Rabi Abdulkadir were reinstated after the Commission reviewed their cases. They were directed to resume their roles but were reminded of the importance of upholding professional ethics and judicial standards.

The JSC also issued warnings to other judicial officers. Senior Magistrate Sakina Aminu was cautioned for assigning a police prosecutor in defiance of directives from the Chief Judge. She was urged to strengthen cooperation with state counsel and comply with judicial circulars that prohibit police prosecutors from handling court cases. Additionally, Alkali Nasiru Ahmad received a warning for careless handling of a criminal matter, with the Commission stating that such negligence could lead to miscarriages of justice.

The Kano JSC reiterated its resolve to maintain transparency, discipline, and ethical conduct within the judicial system, emphasizing its continued zero-tolerance policy toward abuse of office or dereliction of duty.

For those people that collected L0an from one bank then abandoned the bank acc0unt and started using another acc0unt to avoid paying the L0an or the bank removing their m0ney from the acc0unt automatically

Example, you collected L0an from Firstbank then you abandoned the acc0unt and started using 0pay
In fact, na inside 0pay you come dey save your m0ney now to escape Firstbank removing your m0ney

Pls come closer, Atanda have a good news for you

The good news is this ; No escape route for you again

The CBN has introduced the GSI (Global Standing instruction) policy

With the GSI policy
If you refuse to pay back your bank loan and refuse to put any money into the account.
Your bank will have no other option after they have tried to plead with you to pay back your L0an but you refuse,
As the last resort, your bank will activate the GSI mandate.

Meaning that the Bank will check your BVN and check all acc0unts linked to your BVN

They can remove m0ney from any of your savings acc0unts, current acc0unt, joint acc0unt, D0miciliary acc0unt, inv£stment acc0unt, all waLL£ts like Opay, palmpay, kuda Moniepoint and the rest of them

Chai, wahala for people wey collect L0an oooo

Once you see any alert that has GSI in the alert msg
Make you know say
Your ancestors don remember you and one of those bank wey you dey 0we don collect part of their m0ney back.