Columns
Hardship Grant controversy: More States Dispute FG’s Claim of Disbursing N573 Billion Grant
More states have refuted President Tinubu’s claim of a N573bn hardship fund, clarifying it’s a World Bank loan, not a grant.
The controversy surrounding the purported disbursement of N573 billion to subnational governments announced by President Bola Tinubu during a nationwide broadcast on Sunday, continued on Friday, as more States denied receiving such fund from his administration.
Just like the Governor of Nasarawa State, Abdullahi Sule, on Thursday, faulted the claim by the President, Governor of Oyo State, Seyi Makinde, yesterday, also denied receiving the N573 billion hardship grant claimed to have been given to the state governments by the federal government.
Abia and Osun State governments also indicated that they were yet to receive such funds, maintaining that the World Bank intervention was a loan to States and not a grant from the Nigerian government. Other states contacted also declined to comment, in an apparent move not to be seen as being in conflict with the President.
Tinubu had while addressing Nigerians in a broadcast during the #EndBadGovernance nationwide protests against hunger and hardship, said the government had disbursed N573 billion to the 36 states.
However, in a newsletter No 95 |August 2024 personally signed by Makinde, which was shared on his X handle, he said the state was not in the know of such a grant.
Makinde explained: “In my newsletter tonight, I responded to a question from a concerned citizen of Oyo State regarding the claim that the Federal Government ‘gave’ States over N570 billion as some kind of ‘hardship fund’ for citizens.
“Before I speak more on further actions we have taken to show our commitment to productivity and sustainability, let me respond to a long message I received earlier in the week from a concerned citizen. The message was about a purported N570 billion Hardship Fund “given” to the 36 States by the Federal Government. I was queried about what I used the money for.
“Let me state categorically that this is yet another case of misrepresentation of facts. The said funds were part of the World Bank-assisted NG-CARES project—a Programme for Results intervention.
“The World Bank facilitated an intervention to help States in Nigeria with COVID-19 Recovery. CARES means COVID-19 Action Recovery Economic Stimulus. It was called Programme for Results because States had to use their money in advance to implement the programme. After the World Bank verified the amount spent by the State, it reimbursed the States through the platform provided at the Federal level. The Federal Government did not give any State money; they were simply the conduit through which the reimbursements were made to States for money already spent.
“It is important to note that the World Bank fund is a loan to States, not a grant. So, States will need to repay this loan. Note also that NG-CARES, which we christened Oyo-CARES in our State, predates the present federal administration.
“So, in direct response to the message, the Federal Government did not give Oyo State any money. We were reimbursed funds (N5.98 billion in the first instance and N822 million in the second instance) we invested in the three result areas of NG-CARES, which includes inputs distribution to smallholder farmers within our State. In fact, when the World Bank saw our model for the distribution of inputs preceded by biometric capturing of beneficiary farmers, they adopted it as the NG-CARES model.”
Makinde’s denial comes on the heels of controversies that greeted the nationwide hunger and hardship protests.
Also, Abia State Commissioner for Finance, Mr. Mike Akpara, in response to THISDAY’s enquiry, said the federal government’s comment about the purported grant “is vague”.
“They should come out clear and state categorically what they gave each state,” he said, adding that when that is done, governors could be held accountable on how they spent the money.
Akpara, expressed doubt if the federal government was sure of its claims on the disbursement of the said grant to states and wondered if the amount was calculated based on the rice it distributed to states or other forms of palliatives.
According to him, loans are applied for, negotiated and processed on individual basis and any state that needed loan would pursue it without recourse to other states as a group.
Also, responding to THISDAY’s enquiries, a source from Osun State government that pleaded to remain anonymous, said the N573 billion hardship grant claimed to have been given to the state governments by the federal government was not the truth.
Governor Sule had in an interview with Channels Television, stressed that the World Bank loan received by states was for infrastructural projects and not to cushion the effects of hardship faced by Nigerians.
The governor had explained that states received the money in batches with the latest received in June, stressing that it was a loan and not free funds and was initiated in 2020.
“The money is tied to certain projects. It is almost like a regimented loan from the World Bank. The money is not for rice, it is not for palliatives, it is not for anything in that line.
“That money came from the World Bank and that was the second disbursement which came in November last year. The amount was credited to the account of every other state, sometime around January.”
Many Nigerians, including a senior lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana, a human rights crusader and the Chair, of Alliance on Surviving Covid-19 and Beyond (ASCAB), had since the announcement by the President been challenging states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to explain how they spent the N573 billion.
Follow Ekwutosblog to stay informed of all the latest updates
Columns
Sir Kashim Ibrahim at His Swearing-In as Governor of Northern Nigeria
A defining moment in the transition from colonial rule to indigenous leadership in Northern Nigeria.
The image depicts Sir Kashim Ibrahim during his swearing-in ceremony as Governor of the Northern Region of Nigeria, an event that marked a significant milestone in Nigeria’s political evolution. While the photograph is often dated to the late 1950s, historical records confirm that Sir Kashim Ibrahim assumed office in October 1960, shortly after Nigeria attained independence from British colonial rule.
Sir Kashim Ibrahim was appointed Governor of the Northern Region from 1960 to 1966, becoming the first indigenous Nigerian to hold the office. His appointment symbolised the transfer of political authority from colonial administrators to Nigerians and reflected the emerging autonomy of the regions within the newly independent federation.
Born in 1909 in Maiduguri, present-day Borno State, Kashim Ibrahim was a distinguished educator, administrator, and politician. Before entering politics, he had a notable career in education, serving as Provincial Education Officer and later as Minister of Education for the Northern Region, where he played a key role in expanding access to Western education in Northern Nigeria.
The office of Governor during this period was largely ceremonial but politically significant. It represented the Crown at the regional level while reinforcing constitutional governance under Nigeria’s federal structure. As governor, Sir Kashim Ibrahim worked closely with the Northern Region’s political leadership, particularly the government of Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Sardauna of Sokoto, who served as Premier.
His tenure coincided with a formative period in Nigeria’s post-independence history, characterised by efforts at nation-building, regional development, and managing the complexities of ethnic and political diversity. Sir Kashim Ibrahim remained in office until January 1966, when Nigeria’s First Republic was overthrown following the military coup that ended civilian governance.
Beyond politics, Sir Kashim Ibrahim is remembered for his enduring contributions to education and public service in Northern Nigeria. His legacy continues through institutions named in his honour, most notably Sir Kashim Ibrahim College of Education in Maiduguri, which stands as a testament to his lifelong commitment to learning and leadership.
The photograph remains a powerful historical record, capturing a moment when Nigeria formally embraced indigenous leadership at the highest levels of regional governance.
Sources
Falola, Toyin & Matthew Heaton. A History of Nigeria. Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, James S. Nigeria: Background to Nationalism. University of California Press.
Nigerian National Archives, Kaduna – Records of Northern Regional Government (1960–1966).
Columns
Davido’s baby mama, Sophia Momodu, claps back at Snapchat user who accused her of flaunting a replica bag
Sophia Momodu has responded sharply after a Snapchat user tried to drag her over an alleged replica designer bag.
The user accused Sophia of “flaunting a replica” and warned her that this is an era where fake items are easily detected, advising her to stop “setting herself up for drags.”
Sophia was clearly not having it.
In a blunt response, she fired back, telling the user to “hold your chest and say God release me from witchcraft,” adding a sarcastic “you wish?” to shut down the allegation.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSMmzu8jMMN/?igsh=dDR3d2Q3ZXgxYWJu
Columns
Charlie archibong akwa ibom man the deadliest Biafra war lord
“Brigadier Archong” (also referred to as Colonel Charlie Archibong) was a prominent Biafran commander during the Nigerian Civil War (1967-1970), known for his bravery and key role in the Biafran invasion of the Midwest region.
Key Activities During the War
Midwest Invasion Commander: Colonel Archibong was the lead commander of the Biafran forces that invaded Nigeria’s Midwest region on August 9, 1967. His orders were to advance rapidly through the West and capture Dodan Barracks in Lagos within 48 hours. The advance was halted by a controversial retreat order from Brigadier Victor Banjo at Ore, which ultimately led to the failure of the offensive.
Ojukwu blamed himself for not letting achuzie or Charlie archibong lead the troops to capture Nigeria capital city Lagos after the Biafran capital city Enugu was attacked by the Nigerian, even after Charlie archibong territory fell to the Nigerian military Charlie archibong and his people mostly lead to lay a deadly ambush against the Nigerian army in Calabar and akwa ibom and pH and this action Also lead to the killing of innocent civilians by Nigeria army not only Asaba experienced massacred south south of today veteran can testify
Key Biafran Fighter: Archibong was considered one of General Odumegwu Ojukwu’s most trusted and gallant fighters. He was known by the nickname “Charlie Bazooka” and was respected for his zeal and determination.
Further Action: After the Midwest campaign, he saw more action around Ikot Ekpene.
Disappearance/Death: Archibong was reported missing after an officer-led reconnaissance operation, and his command headquarters waited in vain for his return. Sources suggest he may have been killed through internal sabotage within Biafra.
Archibong is remembered as a significant figure in the Biafran military, often appearing in historical photos alongside Ojukwu as a “war hero.
-
Business1 year ago
US court acquits Air Peace boss, slams Mayfield $4000 fine
-
Trending1 year agoNYA demands release of ‘abducted’ Imo chairman, preaches good governance
-
Politics1 year agoMexico’s new president causes concern just weeks before the US elections
-
Politics1 year agoPutin invites 20 world leaders
-
Politics1 year agoRussia bans imports of agro-products from Kazakhstan after refusal to join BRICS
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky falls ill in police custody, rushed to hospital
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky transferred from Immigration to FCID, spends night behind bars
-
Education1 year ago
GOVERNOR FUBARA APPOINTS COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR KEN SARO-WIWA POLYTECHNIC BORI
