Connect with us

Politics

Biafra group writes Tinubu, seeks recognition

Published

on

The Simon Ekpa-led United States of Biafra has written to Nigeria’s President Bola Tinubu, seeking recognition.

This was contained in a letter signed and released on X on Monday by Ekpa’s second in command, Dr. Ngozi Orabueze.

The three-page open letter claimed that the redeclaration of Biafra was done in Finland during a convention with over 50 million Biafrans voting for a referendum on November 29, 2024.

According to Orabueze, known as the Acting Head of State and Deputy Prime Minister, USB, the letter was in line with the United Nations convention on the creation of states.

She wrote: “Dear President Bola Ahmed Tinubu (GCFR), on behalf of the Government of the United States of Biafra (formally known as the Republic of Biafra), we extend our cordial greetings to you.

“The government of the United States of Biafra is contacting the Federal Republic of Nigeria and stakeholders to notify and introduce the newly restored sovereignty of the United States of Biafra, which gained its independence on May 30, 1967, and was officially known as the Republic of Biafra.

“The redeclaration of the Republic of Biafra took place in a significant event in Lahti, Finland, on 29th November 2024, during a convention where Biafrans from all around the world gathered to proclaim the restoration of Biafra’s 1967 independence and officially adopted its new name, The United States of Biafra.’ The Biafran nation comprises 40 states.

“The redeclaration follows a series of organised efforts, mainly by way of referendum carried out in the period from 1st February to 28th November 2024, utilising both electronic and physical voting methods. This referendum engaged over 50 million participants, reflecting a substantial commitment to self-determination among the Biafra people.

“We remind you that the United Nations’ 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States sets forth the criteria to establish statehood.

“Under Article 1, namely: population, government, the ability to enter into foreign relations, control of territory, and respect for human rights and self-determination. Biafra fulfils all the criteria.

“Even before recognition, the state has the right to defend its integrity and independence, to provide for its conservation and prosperity and consequently to organise itself as it sees fit, to legislate upon its interests, to administer its services, and to define the jurisdiction and competence of its courts.

“The exercise of these rights has no other limitation than the exercise of the rights of other states according to international law.

“Our experience has shown that there is no alternative path to having achieved independence than to be vocal and visible in our demands. We must continue to raise our voices, assert our rights, and mobilise collective action to bring attention to our cause as we continue to defend the sovereignty of the United States of Biafra.

“The United States of Biafra is dedicated to establishing robust diplomatic ties with nations worldwide, promoting respect and cooperation in accordance with the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

“We are committed to cultivating a transparent and accountable governance framework, eliminating corruption, and ensuring the rule of law. Our goal is, among others, for the citizens of the United States of Biafra to thrive, reach their full potential, and contribute to the nation’s growth and development.

“The United States of Biafra has come to stay, and our arms are open to receive Nigeria for a constructive dialogue in pursuant of a peaceful and sustainable dissolution that aims at achieving a harmonious and safe disintegration with mutual respect for both countries’ citizens and territorial sovereignty. We are officially reaching out to establish bilateral relations with the Nigerian government in accordance with the principles of diplomacy.

“Achieving a peaceful dissolution is fundamental for our future as neighbours and will undeniably foster deals of mutual benefit for the well-being and prosperity of our citizens.

“The United States of Biafra continues to be recognised by other United Nations members (Gabon, Haiti, Ivory Coast, Tanzania, and Zambia). We seek Nigeria’s acknowledgement and respect for our sovereignty, advocacy for our nationhood, and cooperation in ascertaining and maintaining security on our common borders.

“As a new nation open for mutual and favourable relations, the United States of Biafra is committed to fostering an environment designed to attract local and foreign investments, stimulate innovation, and create opportunities for entrepreneurship and job creation. We will provide a secure and transparent business climate with streamlined regulations and investment incentives.

“By so doing, we aspire to become a hub for trade, commerce, and industry, leveraging our strategic location, abundant resources, and skilled workforce to drive economic growth, reduce poverty, and improve our citizens’ overall quality of life.”

Politics

Obolo: Akwa Ibom groups clash in Calabar over demands for new state

Published

on

Many groups that traveled from Akwa Ibom State to Calabar, capital of Cross River State, venue for the South-South Centre B Zonal Public Hearing on the amendment of the 1999 Constitution, clashed over their demands for the creation of Obolo State from present Akwa Ibom State.

Pro-groups and anti-groups competed in shouting matches and for spaces to display their banners and posters at the venue in a bid to arrest the attention of the lawmakers and other dignitaries present.

Some of the banners against the creation of Obolo State carried inscriptions such as: We Say No to Obolo State on Ibibio Ancestral Land, Don’t Create Obolo State, Entire Akwa Ibom Coastline is Ibibioland, No Inch of Ibibio Land Will Be Ceded to Settlers for a State.

Pro-banners had messages like: Please Create Obolo State. We’re Marginalized, We’re Tired of Deprivations, We Own Oil Wells But No Development, etc.

The pro-groups demanding the creation of Obolo State, which they listed should comprise the five existing LGAs making up Oro Nation in Akwa Ibom—such as Oron, Okobo, Uruefong Oruko, Mbo, Udung Uko, as well as Ibeno, Eastern Obolo, and Andoni in Rivers State, complained of alleged “mindless marginalization” and deprivation by the domineering and majority Ibibio people.

They insisted that they can no longer be denied their freedom and greater opportunities, including infrastructure and development.

They refuted the claims by the larger ethnic group of Ibibio that they are settlers on their lands.

Speaking about the imperatives for the creation of Obolo State, President General of Oro-Obolo Peoples’ Union, Engr. Ngerebara Sampson Adumu, said the creation of Obolo State will right historical wrongs and unlock the vast potentials of the people to the country.

Citing historical and legal documents, Adumu refuted the claims by mainland people of Akwa Ibom State that the people who constitute the Obolo are settlers.

Pleading with the National Assembly to consider the creation of Obolo State, he disclosed that they have a population of over 1.3 million and vast oil potentials, and can survive as a state.

“The claims of Ekid-Ibibio ownership over Obolo, particularly Ibeno lands, are unfounded in law and history, with no credible evidence supporting them.

“We’re not settlers. We have a centuries-long history of habitation along the Atlantic coast, with a distinct cultural identity shaped by our maritime traditions and trade with European merchants dating back to the 17th century.”

One of the leaders of the Ibibio groups, Chief Umoh Ime, insisted that historically the Obolos were originally fishermen who came from today’s Rivers State and were allotted the lands by their forebears.

“They can’t come to claim our lands. They should leave the land, as we shall never cede any parts for a state to be created inside our state.”

Addressing journalists, Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Constitution Review, Mr. Kingsley Chinda, disclosed that the idea of holding zonal engagement was for the Representatives to speak with the people on their concerns on the 1999 Constitution.

Chinda, who is the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, said they want to ensure that Nigerians own their constitution by making inputs on its amendment.

“We want to make our Constitution one that is owned by the people, which is why we are speaking with the people who elected us.

“In this Centre B, we have discussed with the people of Rivers, Akwa Ibom, and Cross River, and we have gotten their inputs. We will take these inputs back to the Parliament for further deliberations,” he noted.

“Some of these inputs will reflect in the about-to-be-amended Constitution, but it would be sent to state assemblies to look at and return to them to conclude actions.”

Several groups from Akwa Ibom, Rivers, and Cross River States attended the session and made their presentations.

Two groups from Rivers State also presented their pleas for the creation of Bori and Atlantic City States.

Movement for the Creation of Ogoja State also made input.

Continue Reading

Politics

Gov. Hope Uzodimma’s Key Demands at Constitution Review Public Hearing

Published

on

Gov. Hope Uzodimma

— Governor-General of Ndi Igbo in Action

By Ambrose Nwaogwugwu | July 20, 2025.

At the public hearing in Owerri, Governor Hope Uzodimma made bold, patriotic demands to correct historical injustices and strengthen national unity. His key advocacies include:

1. Creation of more South East states — at least two, including Anim State, to end underrepresentation.

2. Rotational Presidency — constitutionally rotate presidency among the six geopolitical zones.

3. Indigeneship by birth or 10-year residency — to promote inclusion and national unity.

4. State Police — decentralize policing for better grassroots security.

5. Peaceful engagement — urged Ndi Igbo to push their demands through dialogue, not agitation.

 

With these strong positions, Gov. Uzodimma once again proves himself the Governor-General of Ndi Igbo, boldly speaking truth to power.

— Ambrose Nwaogwugwu is the Senior Special Assistant to the Governor on Electronic and Creative Media.

Continue Reading

Politics

Dogara opposed Muslim-Muslim ticket, then begged for appointment – Ex-aide

Published

on

A former close associate of ex-Speaker of the House of Representatives, Yakubu Dogara, Barrister Maigida Yakubu, has strongly criticised the former lawmaker, describing him as a “master manipulator who has traded honour for deceit, unity for chaos, and trust for betrayal.”

He also accused Dogara of leading the Zaar (Sayawa) community towards division and crisis.

In an eleven-page open letter titled “Behind the Curtain of Deceit: Unmasking the Architect of the Zaar Identity Crisis and Division,” Maigida said Dogara’s recent acceptance of a political appointment from the same government he openly opposed during the 2023 campaigns shows hypocrisy.

He criticised Dogara’s role during the 2023 presidential election, especially his public rejection of the APC’s Muslim-Muslim ticket. Maigida said Dogara presented himself as a moral voice but later went behind the scenes begging for appointments from the same party he attacked.

“Your trademark deceit and constant mistakes have finally received the attention they deserve. If awards were given for political self-destruction, you would win them all. You acted like a hero opposing the APC’s Muslim-Muslim ticket, pretending to be a moral leader. Yet, for the past two years, you’ve been chasing the same people for political favours without shame,” he wrote.

He further mocked Dogara for organising a fake Christian protest crowd, mostly from the Middle Belt, to support his political stand, saying he only does things when they serve his selfish interest.

Maigida said the Tinubu administration only gave Dogara a minor appointment to keep him quiet politically.

“The government knows who you are; that’s why they gave you a small chairmanship position—not out of respect, but to silence you. These days, you move around political offices like a desperate fly, trying to get attention,” he added.

He accused Dogara of using and dividing his people, especially the youth, for personal gain without helping anyone. “Tell us, is there any Basayi son or daughter who can truly say they were empowered during your time in office as Representative and Speaker?” he asked.

According to him, Dogara is more known for acquiring property and building estates using money he made from years of shady dealings in the National Assembly. “In fact, ‘padding’ might be your most memorable legacy from the 8th Assembly, and it will always follow your name like a shadow,” Maigida added.

Continue Reading

Trending