News
Lawyer Abubakar Marshal Defends Nnamdi Kanu’s Right To File Fresh Objection As Court Case Turns ‘Deeply Political’
Marshal, who described the move as “legally sound” and “founded on strong legal principle,” said that the trial of the IPOB leader is “deeply political.”
Human rights lawyer, Abubakar Marshal, has defended the right of the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, to file a fresh objection against the terrorism-related charges brought against him by the Nigerian government.
Marshal, who described the move as “legally sound” and “founded on strong legal principle,” said that the trial of the IPOB leader is “deeply political.”
In a statement made available to SaharaReporters on Tuesday, Marshal argued that Kanu’s latest application to challenge the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court was both lawful and consistent with long-established legal doctrine.
“The application of Nnamdi Kanu to file further objection to his charge is founded on strong legal principle & pedestal,” he said.
“It does not amount to foreclosure of his defence neither is it tantamount to resting his case on that of the prosecution.”
The lawyer stressed that Kanu raising such an objection at this stage of the proceedings was perfectly permissible under Nigerian law.
“It is elementary law that an objection can be raised at any time or stage of proceedings even at the Supreme Court & for as many times possible,” he stated.
Marshal explained that the trial judge was duty-bound to consider and rule on any application properly filed before the court.
“Indeed, a judge is bound to hear & rule one way or the other every application brought to him (even if he feels the application is ‘foolish’),” he said.
According to him, Kanu’s decision to challenge the jurisdictional footing of his charge is a legitimate step in his defense.
“By proposing a fresh objection challenging the jurisdictional footing of his charge, Nnamdi kanu is legally right.
“It is only upon the determination of the objection that the court can move to the next stage; If the objection succeeds, the case terminates, if otherwise, then he has to enter his defence properly,” Marshal noted.
He dismissed as “legally incorrect” the claim that Kanu had forfeited or withdrawn his defense or that he had opted to rest his case on the prosecution’s evidence.
“The claim that he has forfeited or withdrawn his defense or that he has elected to rest his case on that of the prosecution is legally incorrect with all due respect,” Marshal emphasised.
The lawyer also expressed his conviction that Kanu’s trial was more political than legal in nature, urging the government to pursue dialogue instead of confrontation.
“It is my strong conviction that the case of Nnamdi Kanu is a political case,” he said. “The state stands to gain more by striking a good deal and extracting some fantastic undertaking from him through dialogue.
“A government that is quick to grant amnesty to terrorists and negotiate with bandits should not be reluctant to find a political solution to a case that would bring stability to an entire region.”
On Monday, Kanu withdrew his earlier decision to call witnesses in his ongoing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja, insisting that there are no legitimate charges against him.
Kanu told Justice James Omotosho that after a careful review of the prosecution’s case file, he concluded that the Nigerian government had failed to establish any valid charge to warrant a defence.
Kanu, who had earlier filed a formal application to summon witnesses in his defense, told the court that the decision was no longer necessary since, in his words, “no competent charge exists against me.”
The Biafran Nation agitator argued that he had been subjected to an unjust process and that the evidence tendered by the prosecution did not in any way prove the allegations brought against him by the Nigerian government.
In response, Justice Omotosho advised Kanu to put his new position into writing and formally serve it on the prosecution team, noting that it was crucial for the court record.
Recall that Kanu earlier named former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) Abubakar Malami and several prominent Nigerians as witnesses in his ongoing terrorism trial.
Those also listed include the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike; former Minister of Defence, Gen. Theophilus Danjuma (rtd); former Chief of Army Staff, Gen. Tukur Buratai (rtd); Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu; and Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma.
Others named are Minister of Works, Dave Umahi; immediate past Governor of Abia State, Okezie Ikpeazu; former Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), Ahmed Rufai Abubakar; and former Director-General of the Department of State Services (DSS), Yusuf Bichi.
Kanu has been in detention since his re-arrest in Kenya and extradition to Nigeria in 2021.
The Supreme Court in December 2023 upheld the continuation of his trial at the Federal High Court in Abuja after ruling that his arrest, though irregular, did not nullify the charges against him.
Kanu’s legal team has since continued to challenge the jurisdiction and fairness of the proceedings.
His continued detention has sparked widespread calls for a political solution from rights groups, traditional leaders, and political figures who argue that resolving the matter through dialogue could help ease rising tensions in the South-East.
News
President Tinubu Swears In Gen. Christopher Musa As Minister of Defence
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, on Thursday, swore in General Christopher Gwabin Musa (rtd) as Minister of Defence at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.
General Musa’s appointment follows the resignation of Alhaji Mohammed Badaru Abubakar on Monday, December 1, 2025. His nomination was announced the following day and transmitted to the Senate, where it received expedited screening and confirmation.

Born in Sokoto in 1967, General Musa was commissioned as a Second Lieutenant into the Nigerian Army in 1991 and had a distinguished military career. He was appointed Chief of Defence Staff by President Tinubu in 2023 and retired in October 2025.
As Chief of Defence Staff, he championed inter-service security collaboration.
With his swearing-in, the new Defence Minister is expected to immediately assume duties as the Tinubu administration seeks to consolidate recent security gains and fast-track reforms aimed at achieving lasting peace and stability nationwide.
Senate President Godswill Akpabio, Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele, Chairman, Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, Sen. Adeniyi Adegbonmire, the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, and the National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, attended the swearing-in ceremony.
Also in attendance were the spouse of the new Minister, Mrs Lilian Oghogho Musa; Chief of Defense Staff, General Olufemi Oluyede; Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Sokoto, Matthew Hassan Kukah; and Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs (rtd).
News
EFCC files appeal against release of 27 properties belonging to Okoye, company
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, has said it has appealed the judgment of the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, which ordered the release of twenty-seven houses to James Ibechukwu Okoye and his company.
In the Notice of Appeal filed at the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal, the Commission expressed dissatisfaction with the decision of the trial court, which was delivered on October 31, 2025.
EFCC counsel, Abba Mohammed, SAN, sought two orders from the Court of Appeal, which include; Staying the execution of the judgment of the trial court pending the hearing and determination of the appeal; and such further or other orders as the court may deem fit to make in the circumstances.
Meanwhile, the Commission said it felt obliged to correct the distortions and misrepresentations contained in a news story titled “EFCC Invades Abuja Property Despite Court Order Restraining Agency, Awarding N20 million To Jona Brothers”.
It explained in a statement on X that the Abuja property, Plot 680-689 Cadastral Zone B06, Mabushi, Abuja, referenced in the report, is a subject of criminal charge before Justice A.I Kutigi of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court .
However, the EFCC said it sought and secured an order of interim forfeiture of the property before Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja pending the determination of the criminal charge before Justice Kutigi.
“In granting the order, the court authorized the EFCC to ‘appoint competent persons/ firm to manage the assets/properties listed in the schedule therein, temporarily forfeited to the Federal Government pending the conclusion of investigation and determination of criminal charges against the suspect,’”
“It is also important to point out that the criminal charge struck out by Justice Osho Adebiyi and the N20m cost she awarded is not in any way connected to the interim order.
“In addition, the enforcement of the interim forfeiture order of the property by the Commission is without prejudice to ongoing appeals on court pronouncements about the true ownership of the property. The appeals are ongoing and the EFCC is diligently attending proceedings.”
News
Nigeria’s judiciary remains committed to human rights protection – CJN Kekere-Ekun
The Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun has reaffirmed the commitment of the country’s judiciary to protection of human rights as enshrined in the 1999 Constitution and other international laws and treaties.
She emphasized that the judiciary remains steadfast in its constitutional mandate to uphold the rule of law and protect the rights of citizens.
The CJN spoke on Thursday at the conference on ‘Proportional Force and Respect for Human Dignity: A Dialogue in Governance’, organized by the National Human Rights Commission, NHRC, in collaboration with Citizen FM.
The Administrator of the National Judicial Institute, NJI, Justice Babatunde Adeniran Adejumo, represented the Chief Justice of Nigeria at the conference.
In the goodwill message, Justice Kekere-Ekun congratulated the National Human Rights Commission on its 30th anniversary and commended the organizers for holding the conference on International Human Rights Day.
She emphasized that when authority is exercised with restraint, discipline, and accountability, it strengthens public trust and reinforces the legitimacy of institutions.
The CJN reiterated the judiciary’s commitment to protecting human rights and providing remedies where they are infringed.
“Let me make it abundantly clear that the judiciary remains steadfast in its constitutional mandate to uphold the rule of law and protect the rights of citizens,” she said.
The CJN further commended the NHRC for promoting dialogue and awareness on critical human rights issues in Nigeria.
-
Business1 year ago
US court acquits Air Peace boss, slams Mayfield $4000 fine
-
Trending1 year agoNYA demands release of ‘abducted’ Imo chairman, preaches good governance
-
Politics1 year agoMexico’s new president causes concern just weeks before the US elections
-
Politics1 year agoPutin invites 20 world leaders
-
Politics1 year agoRussia bans imports of agro-products from Kazakhstan after refusal to join BRICS
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky falls ill in police custody, rushed to hospital
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky transferred from Immigration to FCID, spends night behind bars
-
Education1 year ago
GOVERNOR FUBARA APPOINTS COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR KEN SARO-WIWA POLYTECHNIC BORI
