Connect with us

News

Lawyer asks Reps to question Ibas over ‘unconstitutional’ execution of emergency rule proclamation

Published

on

A legislative lawyer, Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja, has asked the House of Representatives Ad-hoc Committee on Oversight of the State of Emergency in Rivers State to question the Sole Administrator, Ibok-Ete Ibas, over ‘unconstitutional’ steps he has been taking in executing the emergency rule proclamation in the state.

Ekwutosblog reports that Ibas, on 25th April 2025, honoured the invitation of the House committee but pleaded for more time to properly brief the lawmakers on the situation in Rivers.

The meeting was summoned in line with the House of Representatives resolve to take over legislative duties in Rivers, following the suspension of the State Assembly for the six months period of the emergency rule.

The governor, Sim Fubara, and his deputy were also suspended for the duration of the state of emergency.

In an open letter addressed to Professor Jake Dan-Azumi, Head of Secretariat of the Reps Ad-hoc Committee on Rivers, Jaja, a legislative drafting expert, highlighted unconstitutional actions taken by Ibas in administering Rivers State, over which he said the lawmakers should demand answers from the sole administrator.

The letter dated 28th April 2025, it titled ‘Open Letter to Prof. Jake Dan-Azumi, Head of Secretariat of the Ad-hoc Committee of the HoR on Oversight of the State of Emergency in Rivers State – (Questions That The Sole Administrator Must Answer Regarding Dissolution of the Rivers State Judicial Service Commission, Appointment of LGA Sole Administrators and Exercise of Core Legislative Functions by the Sole Administrator)’.

Jaja, Director of the Centre for Legal, Parliamentary and Printing Consult (PTY) Limited (CLPPC), noted that the sole administrator of Rivers State, being a creation of a legislation of the National Assembly – namely the Proclamation State of Emergency (Rivers State) 2025 – is subject to the oversight of the National Assembly.

The letter added, “There are many issues that your Committee ought to provide clarification when you finally get the chance to hold the meeting with the Sole Administrator of Rivers. Let me point out some as follows:

“The Proclamation of a State of Emergency in Rivers State does not imply that the legislature and the will of the people was removed and replaced by a military styled dictatorship. It appears that the Sole Administrator of Rivers State and his legal advisers are of the opinion that the legislation that Proclaimed a State of Emergency in Rivers State gave him the powers to perform legislative functions.This wrong impression is far from the truth, Section 3 of the said legislation specifically stated that the only form of legislation to be enacted is Regulations, and Regulations are a form of subsidiary legislation that are made pursuant to a primary legislation (which in this case is the Proclamation of State of Emergency in Rivers State, 2025 as enacted by the National Assembly pursuant to Section 305 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999).

“Even the said Regulations which the Sole Administrator is authorised to enact are subject to the prior approval of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as specified under the Proclamation of State of Emergency in Rivers State, 2025.

“The judgment of the 28th February 2025 of the Supreme Court of Nigeria was specific in stating that it is never in the contemplation of the Nigerian Constitution that a military dictatorship (or in this instance, a Sole Administrator
of Rivers State) would replace and over-ride governance by the people through their representatives as constituted by a legislature. It is true that the said legislation suspended the entire members of the Rivers State House of Assembly, however, it did not suspend the representatives of the people of Rivers State at the National Assembly.

“Therefore, as representatives of the people of Rivers State, the Ad-hoc Committee on Oversight of Rivers State is humbly appealed to question whether there was any input of Rivers State people or their representatives regarding the Sole Administrator of Rivers State when he appointed 23 Local Government Area (LGAs) Sole Administrators for the 23 LGAs Councils of Rivers State and other actions involving appropriation of funds of the Rivers State government bearing in mind that by its judgment of July 2024, the Supreme Court of Nigeria has laid down a rule of law that it is illegal for LGAs in Nigeria tobe administered by non-elected officials and it is also illegal to allocate funds to any such LGAs that are administered by non-elected officials.”

The lawyer equally said the lawmakers should ask the sole administrator where he derived the power to unilaterally dissolve the Rivers State Judicial Service Commission and other similar statutory agencies such as the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC), without the approval of any legislature.

“Assuming the Sole Administrator of Rivers State is to argue that he derived the power pursuant to Section 3 of the Proclamation legislation, the said Proclamation legislation only empowers the Sole Administrator to enact Regulations which are a form of subsidiary legislation. And there is no way on earth that a subsidiary legislation can be enacted to nullify or amend the wordings of a primary legislation such as the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission Law, No 2 of 2018.

“There are many other questions that the Ad-hoc Committee on Oversight of theState of Emergency in Rivers State ought to ask the Sole Administrator such as where he received legislative approval for appointment of a Secretary to the Rivers State Government and other officials who are to receive appropriation from the funds of Rivers State whereas the constitution of Nigeria is clear that only funds appropriated and approved by the legislature can be expended,” the letter added.

Jaja stressed that the duty of the Ad-hoc Committee is essential to confirm that the Proclamation legislation has been complied with, to prevent autocratic conduct by the sole administrator.

News

EFCC Arrests Nine Suspected Illegal Miners in Niger

Published

on

 

Operatives of the Kaduna Zonal Directorate of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, have arrested nine suspected illegal miners in Niger State.

They were arrested in Kaniyan Village, Mokwa Local Government Area of Niger State, following actionable intelligence on their illegal mining activities.

The suspects comprise five Chinese and four Nigerians.
The Chinese suspects are: Wu Ping, Xu XianLiang, Xu Aimin, Xeu Cihuo, Liu Changhua, while the Nigerians are, Ibrahim Abdullahi, Sunday Oladele, Destiny John, and Bulus Samuel.

Items found in their possession upon their arrest include, one Stamford power generating set, one super quality power generating set, Inlong power generating set, three industrial crushing machines, three small industrial crushing machines, one Quangutaigaajing JIareshebei gold melting machine, four small dumper trucks, three pay loaders, three Elepaq water pumping machine, one Tacoma truck, one Lexus 470 SUV, three diesel rubber tanks, one Taiyo power generating set, one Senwei SP6800 small power generating set, one Laison 40000x power generating set, one welding machine (Bx1-400), one 25.2kg activated carbon chemical, four drilling machines and one kaishan KSCY-33018 power generating set.
Others are: one JMC power generating set, one Yuchai power generating set, one filing machine, four gas powered power generating sets, one extractor, two big gas cylinders, one Honda pumping machine, one Super Zandaz water pumping machine, one Max Mec welding machine, two cartons of explosives, three cap for blasting stones, a white-coloured detection device, two small scales, two mining head gear/safety cap, a laptop computer and seven bottles of chemicals.

They will be charged to court as soon as investigations are concluded.

 

Continue Reading

News

Court to rule on Yahaya Bello’s application to travel abroad for medical July 17

Published

on

Justice Maryann Anenih of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory on Tuesday, fixed July 17 for ruling on an application filed by the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello seeking to travel out of the country on health grounds.

At the resumed hearing of the money laundering case filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission against the former governor, his counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN, told the court that he had filed an application, dated 19th June, 2025 and filed on June 20, 2025.

“It seeks an order for the release of the 1st defendant/applicant’s international passport by the Registrar of the court to enable him to travel for medical attention,” he said.

The counsel said the application was predicated on 13 grounds in the face of the motion paper and supported by 22 paragraphs affidavit deposed to by Yahaya Bello himself.

The EFCC Counsel had filed a counter-affidavit, saying granting the request could delay further proceedings.

Daudu, SAN, in response to the prosecution team’s counter-affidavit, said the Defendant’s team had also filed a further affidavit of 20 paragraphs, filed on July 7, 2025, and deposed to by the applicant himself with two exhibits.

“Exhibits C is the Certified True Copy of the ruling of your lordship, admitting the defendant to bail and Exhibit D is the ruling of the Federal High Court also admitting him to bail.

“We adopt these documents in urging your lordship to grant our application,” he stated.

Responding to the Prosecution’s argument that the application was an abuse of court process in the sense that a similar application was filed at Federal High Court, Daudu argued that it could not be an abuse of court process.

He hinged his argument on the fact that it was the complainant that instituted the two separate charges in the separate courts.

“It will be a futile exercise to apply in one court and not to apply in the other court,” Daudu, SAN submitted.

The prosecution counsel, Chukwudi Enebele, SAN, while defending the EFCC’s counter-affidavit, said Yahaya Bello should have put his sureties on notice with regard to his application to travel out of the country.

According to him, the sureties need to decide whether they would want to continue to stand as sureties for him when he travels.

He added that by filing the same application at both the FCT High Court and Federal High Court, the Defendant’s Counsel were setting the courts on a collision course.

“If Federal High Court refuses that application and my lord grants it, it will make mockery of our Judicial system,” the EFCC lawyer argued.

Responding, Daudu SAN said, on the issue of suretyship, the sureties were already aware.

“We need not put them on notice,” he said.

“Finally, on the interpol matter, Daudu said that the issue of Interpol likely to arrest the applicant is a dead argument, the applicant having submitted himself for trial.

“He has never flouted your lordship’s order. They themselves have even forgotten about those red alerts,” the lawyer added, urging the court to grant the application.

After listening to both parties, Justice Anenih adjourned the case to July 17, 2025 for ruling.

Continue Reading

News

Kano emirate tussle: Bayero’s supporters attacked my palace, removed my gate – Emir Sanusi

Published

on

Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, has alleged attack on his palace gate by supporters of the deposed 15th Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado Bayero.

Sanusi alleged that Bayero’s supporters removed one of his palace gates during the attack.

A statement by the Kano Emirate Media Team, signed by Sadam Yakasai, said Aminu’s supporters struck the Kofar-Kudu palace, where Sanusi resides.

The statement said: “They broke the gate and attacked the guards, injuring some of them. They smashed the police vehicles in the palace.

“Aminu deliberately passed through the emir’s palace road instead of taking the proper route from Koki to Nassarawa, and his hoodlums decided to attack Gidan Rumfa.

“This is not the first time he has passed through the area. He had done that previously after he visited his Mandawari residence. He did that to intimidate the people of the area.”

Continue Reading

Trending