Connect with us

News

Sowore Schools DSS Over Demand to Pull Down Tweet Against Tinubu

Published

on

The @OfficialDSSNG has finally sent me a letter asking me to delete my tweet and @facebook posting against Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubuu. Here is their letter and my response to their DG.

September 12, 2025

 

The Director General,

Department of State Security Services,

National Headquarters,

Yellow House,

Aso Drive, Abuja.

 

Attention: Uwem Davies, fsi

 

Dear Director General,

 

Re: Demand for Retraction of Criminal, False, and Malicious Post Publication

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter, which you stealthily dumped with a security guard at the office of my attorneys in Abuja, addressed to Abubakar Marshal. I find your horrendous attempt at holding an unwarranted brief for the President not only insidious but fundamentally defective, flawed in principle, and absolutely unlawful.

 

The State Security Service was not created as a security institution. The SSS, now self-styled as the DSS, began as the “E” Department (Special Branch), an office established in 1948 and initially located in the Office of the Inspector General of Police. It was later renamed the National Security Organization (NSO), but on June 5, 1986, the Federal Military Government issued Decree No. 19, dissolving the NSO and unbundling it into three entities: the SSS for domestic intelligence, the NIA for external intelligence and counterintelligence, and the DIA for military-related intelligence. While the NIA and DIA largely kept faith with their mandates, the SSS under successive Director Generals has consistently acted bullishly, illegally, and unlawfully—serving as a ready tool of oppression for dictatorial regimes bent on breaking rules and repressing the rights of the Nigerian people.

 

Thus, it is no surprise that you have once again resumed repressive hostility against me.

In 1993, while I was Student Union President at the University of Lagos, policemen abducted me from the university gate during a peaceful pro-democracy protest. I was taken to your Lagos office after being driven around with my head tucked under a seat. From Awolowo Way in Ikoyi, I was detained unlawfully for weeks at the notorious Inter-Center near Ikoyi Cemetery. It took several days of lecture boycotts to force your hand to release me without charges.

 

Again, in January and June 1996, during and after my National Youth Service Corps in Yola, Adamawa State, your men detained me and later transferred me to the Nigerian Air Force base, where I was held in hand and leg chains for over a week before release, again without charges. My NYSC discharge certificate has been denied to me to this day because of your unlawful detention.

 

In August 2019, DSS agents invaded my hotel room, abducted me, and detained me for months over trumped-up allegations of treasonable felony, money laundering, and Cybercrime. It was your first attempt to falsely accuse me of insulting a sitting President.

That failed, as did every other false accusation advanced against me by the Government through the SSS and Police. During that period, you flouted several court judgments. Most disgracefully, your men invaded a Federal High Court presided by Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu to abduct me even after bail conditions were met. To this day, you continue to refuse to obey two court judgments ordering the return of my confiscated properties, including several mobile phones and payment of damages.

 

You and your ilk have dragged me through unscrupulous abuse and gross violations of rights for decades without remorse.

 

In 2021, during the inglorious Buhari years, your agency propped up a sham group, the Incorporated Trustees of Global Integrity Crusade Network, to sue Sahara Reporters and me on behalf of the criminally minded Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN). They prayed the court to compel me and others to pay Malami ₦2 billion for alleged “trauma and emotional stress” caused by Sahara Reporters’ publications in July 2020.

 

In his judgment, Justice Obiora Egwuatu awarded ₦100,000 against the litigants, affirming the argument of our attorney, Marshal Abubakar, that they had no right to sue on Malami’s behalf, just as you have no right to act as proxy for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Defamation, the judge reminded, is a personal tort. The AGF should have gone to court himself if he felt defamed.

 

It is elementary that only the person defamed can sue. Therefore, your attempt to demand a retraction is an incompetent and unlawful attempt to hold the President’s brief.

 

Section 22 of the 1999 Constitution requires the press to uphold the government’s responsibility and accountability to the people. Section 39 guarantees every citizen the right to freedom of expression, to hold opinions, and to receive and impart information without interference. Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights provides the same.

 

Even in the UK, sedition and libel laws have been repealed as archaic relics of a bygone era. The UN Human Rights Committee in General Comment No. 34 has declared a free, uncensored media essential to democracy. Courts across Africa, including Zimbabwe’s Supreme Court and the African Court in Issa Konate v. Burkina Faso, have ruled that criminal defamation is unjustifiable in a democracy.

 

Nigeria’s own Court of Appeal, in Arthur Nwankwo v. State (1985), struck down sedition laws when Nwankwo was convicted for criticizing Governor Jim Nwobodo. The court held that sedition was unconstitutional and inimical to free speech. Justice Adekeye, in IGP v. ANPP, asked how long Nigerians must suffer under colonial-era public order ordinances designed to gag dissent.

 

Criticism is indispensable in a democracy. Freedom of speech includes the right to say what those in power find uncomfortable. Justice Olatawura reminded us that citizens must defend their hard-won freedom of expression, and that those in public office must not be intolerant of criticism. Where boundaries are crossed, the remedy is civil libel, not unlawful repression.

 

The DSS’s desire to please the powers that be has always destroyed institutions while building “strong men.” But where are those strong men today, after your service broke laws and trampled rights to protect them?

 

Rather than vilification, we should be commended for living up to our constitutional responsibility to hold leaders accountable. I am glad you made reference to my constant desire to seek change, the very drive that led me to run for the position of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, even though my commitments and convictions predate partisan political endeavors. It is from that same line of conviction that I have adopted an uncompromising stance, ensuring that this country does not continue down the path of perdition.

 

You have no business telling me how to criticise the President. But, knowing the nature of your service, it is clear you have not learnt your lessons. Let me state it clearly once again: the determination of the Nigerian people to reclaim their country from thieves in power is unwavering. And it shall be achieved.

Freedom cometh by struggle. Aluta continua, victoria ascerta.

 

Yours in unwavering service to Nigeria,

Omoyele Sowore

Former Presidential Candidate, African Action Congress (AAC)

News

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL FLAGS IMO “TIGER BASE,” VOWS PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGED RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.

Published

on

 

By Prince Uwalaka Chimaroke
14- DEC- 2025

Amnesty International has announced plans to make public, within the week, a comprehensive report detailing alleged human rights violations at the Tiger Base detention facility in Owerri, the Imo State capital. The organisation said its findings point to what it described as deep-rooted and disturbing practices that raise serious concerns about the conduct of security operations and the protection of fundamental rights.

Speaking on behalf of the organisation, the Country Director of Amnesty International in Nigeria, Isa Sanusi, stated that the group’s investigations, carried out over several months, uncovered accounts that suggest a pattern of abuse at the facility. He described the allegations as severe and warned that their implications extend beyond Imo State to Nigeria’s broader human rights reputation.

According to Sanusi, Amnesty International believes that the continued operation of facilities accused of such practices undermines public trust in the justice and security system. He stressed that the organisation is releasing its findings in the interest of transparency and public awareness, noting that citizens have a right to know how detention centres are being run.

The rights body also called on relevant authorities to respond promptly to the allegations, emphasizing the need for independent scrutiny and accountability where violations are established. Amnesty maintained that addressing such concerns decisively is essential to restoring confidence in law enforcement institutions.

Beyond the situation in Imo State, the organisation also commented on recent political developments in West Africa, including the attempted coup in the Benin Republic. Sanusi clarified that Amnesty’s position is not driven by political interests but by concern for the human rights consequences that often accompany military interventions and political instability.

He observed that military takeovers frequently result in the erosion of civil liberties and the suspension of democratic safeguards, adding that the recurring instability in the sub-region highlights the urgent need to strengthen democratic institutions and governance structures. According to him, democracy remains the most reliable framework for safeguarding human rights when it functions effectively and delivers justice to citizens.

Amnesty International further noted that it will continue to monitor developments in Benin and other parts of the region while sustaining its focus on domestic human rights issues in Nigeria. The organisation reiterated that the protection of human dignity must remain paramount, regardless of political or security challenges.

Sanusi concluded by stating that the forthcoming report on the Tiger Base facility should be seen as a call for introspection and reform, stressing that accountability within Nigeria is closely linked to the country’s standing and credibility on the international stage.

 

Continue Reading

News

UK Will Pay With Blood If It Doesn’t Take Putin’s WW3 Warning Serious – Ukrainian Major Warns (Details)

Published

on

A senior Ukrainian military officer has warned that Britain is dangerously unprepared for a major war and could pay a “high price” if Russian President Vladimir Putin expands the conflict in Ukraine to Europe.

Viktor Andrusiv, a major in the Ukrainian armed forces and former presidential adviser, said the UK must urgently learn from Ukraine’s experience before it is too late. His warning comes amid growing concern across NATO that Russia could escalate hostilities if diplomatic efforts fail.

Speaking against the backdrop of renewed calls by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte for Europe to prepare for war “like our grandparents endured,” Andrusiv said the greatest danger lies in disbelief. According to him, many people in Western countries still struggle to accept that large-scale war on European soil is a real possibility.

“The biggest problem is that people don’t believe this can happen,” Andrusiv said. He noted that Ukraine faced a similar mindset before Russia’s full-scale invasion, when the idea of tank columns and missile strikes seemed unthinkable in the 21st century.

Putin has recently warned that Russia is prepared to go to war with Europe if peace talks over Ukraine collapse, raising fears of a direct confrontation with NATO. Such a scenario would automatically draw in the UK under the alliance’s collective defence commitments.

British defence chiefs have already cautioned that the country’s armed forces have been “hollowed out” after decades of reduced military spending following the Cold War. Andrusiv agreed with that assessment, arguing that the UK’s military structure and equipment are outdated.

“I am sure you are not prepared,” he said. “That doesn’t mean you would lose for sure, but if you are not prepared, you will pay a higher price.”

Continue Reading

News

“Bandits Who Killed My Husband Threatening To Kill Me If I Dont Marry Their Leader” – Plateau Widow Cries Out For Help

Published

on

A young widow in Plateau State has raised the alarm over persistent death threats allegedly issued by terrorists who killed her husband and are now pressuring her to marry one of their leaders or risk being murdered alongside her children.

The woman, who identified herself simply as Nanbam, disclosed her ordeal on Friday during an interview with the international non-governmental organisation, Equipping the Persecuted. She said her husband was among 40 residents killed during a brutal attack on Mushere community in Bokkos Local Government Area in August.

According to Nanbam, the assailants stormed the village, surrounded residents and carried out mass killings. She alleged that her husband was gruesomely murdered, claiming that his attackers mutilated his body before disposing of it in a nearby pond.

She further revealed that shortly after the attack, the same group began contacting her, insisting that their leader wanted to marry her. Nanbam said the calls started on the very day her husband was killed, allegedly made using her late husband’s phone number.

“They told me their leader wanted to marry me,” she said, adding that she rejected the proposal outright, stating she would never marry someone responsible for killing her husband and the father of her children.

Nanbam alleged that since then, the threats have intensified, with the callers warning that she and her three children would be killed if she continued to refuse the marriage and decline conversion to Islam. She said the callers frequently use different phone numbers, making it difficult to block or trace them.

In a bid to escape the threats, the widow said she relocated to her hometown in Mangu Local Government Area. Despite changing her SIM card on the advice of family members, she said the calls resumed weeks later, with the callers claiming they had tracked her location and threatening to attack not only her but also her children and extended family members.

She described her situation as desperate, noting that she is still grieving her husband while struggling to raise her children alone amid constant fear for their lives.

Nanbam also alleged that her attempt to seek help from the police yielded no meaningful response. She claimed officers told her the callers could not be traced due to the use of multiple phone numbers and allegedly asked her to provide money to support tracking efforts, a request she said she could not afford.

“I don’t know where to run to anymore,”she lamented, appealing for urgent help and protection as she fears that her life and those of her children remain in imminent danger.

Continue Reading

Trending