Connect with us

Politics

US and Russia to ‘normalise’ relationship and start Ukraine talks, officials say

Published

on

US and Russian officials meet in Saudi Arabia on Monday Feb 17, 2025. © AP Photo

US and Russian officials, who met for high-stakes talks in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, agreed to “normalise” relations between the two countries and begin discussions on the war in Ukraine, the US State Department said.

US State Secretary Marco Rubio called the meeting “the first step of a long and difficult journey.”

He added that concessions should be made on both sides but that it would be wrong to “predetermine those”.

US National Security Adviser Michael Waltz said that discussion of territory and security guarantees would “underlie” any type of talks moving forward and insisted there should be an “end” to Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Both Rubio and Waltz pushed back on suggestions that European officials would be left out of negotiations, with Rubio concluding that the EU would be involved as it had “sanctions (against Russia) that have been imposed.”

Waltz, for his part, said that the US allies were being consulted “literally almost on a daily basis, and we’ll continue to do so.”

Both sides also briefly discussed a potential meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, although Putin’s aide Yuri Ushakov added that such a meeting would be unlikely next week.

Overall, discussions were “not bad”, according to Ushakov. “It is still difficult to say that (the positions of Russia and the United States) are converging, but there was talk about it,” he said after the meeting.

Ushakov was present in the meeting alongside Waltz, Rubio, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and US special envoy Steve Witkoff.

‘No agreement about us without us’

The meeting in the Saudi Arabian capital Riyadh was the first in-person discussion between top officials from both countries since the Kremlin launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine almost three years ago.

The meeting comes as Trump upended years of foreign policy towards Russia by holding a phone call with Putin last Wednesday and declaring that both had agreed to start negotiations immediately.

A whirlwind week of speeches by US officials followed, in which it emerged that the Washington was seemingly uninterested in Ukraine’s core demands for peace — including its long-held NATO ambitions — and that European leaders would not immediately have a seat at the negotiating table.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Monday that Kyiv would not recognise any peace agreement made without its participation.

“We cannot recognise … any agreements about us without us,” Zelenskyy said, adding that Ukraine was not made aware of the talks in Riyadh.

Kremlin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that the meeting would be devoted to the “preparation of possible negotiations on the Ukrainian settlement and the organisation of a meeting between the two presidents.”

On Monday, Lavrov said Moscow would hear out its US colleagues in comments cited by the state-run Tass news agency but added that Europe had “no place at the negotiating table.”

He also said Russia had no intention of making territorial concessions to Ukraine during the peace talks, a likely sticking point between Putin and Zelenskyy.

Kyiv has insisted that any peace deal would include the full withdrawal of Russian troops from areas Moscow has seized during the invasion, as well as the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea — which Moscow annexed in 2014 — and the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk.

Ahead of the talks, Kirill Dmitriev, the head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund, who the Kremlin said might also join the meeting, said, “Good US-Russia relations are very important for the whole world. Only jointly can Russia and the US address lots of world problems, resolve global conflicts and offer solutions.”

Zelenskyy said he would also be travelling to Saudi Arabia in a video briefing on Monday, although he stressed that his visit was not linked to Russia-US peace talks.

Keith Kellogg, Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine, is also set to visit Zelenskyy in Kyiv on Thursday.

In response to fast-moving negotiations that seemed to be taking place without Europe, French President Emmanuel Macron convened an emergency meeting in Paris on Monday with other European leaders.

After the meeting, they vowed to continue supporting Ukraine but failed to provide concrete security guarantees, including a potential idea to send peacekeeping troops to Ukrainian territory.

Politics

How Buhari shocked me 6 months into his administration – Oyegun

Published

on

Chairman, Policy Manifesto Committee of the African Democratic Congress, ADC, John Odigie-Oyegun, says former president Muhammadu Buhari gave him the shock of his life, six months into his administration as Nigeria’s leader.

Oyegun made this disclosure on Friday when he featured in an interview on Arise Television’s ‘Prime Time’.

He revealed that as National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress, APC, he went to tell Buhari that he was not delivering his election promises to Nigerians but that the late president told him he would not rule with strictness, but rather wanted to show Nigerians that he is a true civilian president.

The former APC National Chairman lamented that it became business as usual, from there.

“I was national chairman of the APC. Six months or less into our assuming office, fairly alarmed, I went to the late President Buhari for a one-on-one talk. I said Mr President, this is not what the people were expecting. They wanted a bit of the old president Buhari.

“And he explained to me, Mr Chairman, I have learned my lesson. I was shocked. And don’t forget at that time, a lot of prominent Nigerians took their holidays abroad, just to be sure and see what this new sheriff in town will be.

“Buhari told me he wants to now show the people that he’s a true civilian president in Agbada. And by the time we finished the conversation, I said Oh God, we are finished. Because, if he’s not ready to be strict, what’s the point?

“Weeks later, months later, years later, I was proven correct. And of course, it became business as usual, only that they are a new set of tenants in Aso Rock. That was a shocker,” he said.

Continue Reading

Politics

Electoral Reform: Dino alleges senate’s plot to rig 2027 election

Published

on

Former lawmaker, Dino Melaye Esq, has raised concerns over the Senate’s reported rejection of the electronic transmission of election results.

The move, according to Melaye, is a clear endorsement of election rigging and an indication of a sinister plan to rig the 2027 elections.

In a statement on Friday, the former lawmaker criticized the Senate’s decision, stating that it undermines the credibility of the electoral process.

The African Democratic Congress, ADC chieftain, also stated that the move opens the door for electoral manipulation and fraud.

He further warned that the rejection of electronic transmission of results is a step backwards for democracy in Nigeria.

Melaye called on lawmakers and citizens to stand up against “this blatant attempt to undermine the will of the people and ensure that future elections are free, fair, and transparent”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Electoral Act: Nigerians have every reason to be mad at Senate – Ezekwesili

Published

on

Former Minister of Education, Oby Ezekwesili, has said Nigerians have every reason to be mad at the Senate over the ongoing debate on e-transmission of election results.

Ezekwesili made this known on Friday when she featured in an interview on Arise Television’s ‘Morning Show’ monitored by DAILY POST.

DAILY POST reports that the Senate on Wednesday turned down a proposed change to Clause 60, Subsection 3, of the Electoral Amendment Bill that aimed to compel the electronic transmission of election results.

Reacting to the matter, Ezekwesili said, “The fundamental issue with the review of the Electoral Act is that the Senate retained the INEC 2022 Act, Section 60 Sub 5.

“This section became infamous for the loophole it provided INEC, causing Nigerians to lose trust. Since the law established that it wasn’t mandatory for INEC to transmit electoral results in real-time, there wasn’t much anyone could say.

“Citizens embraced the opportunity to reform the INEC Act, aiming to address ambiguity and discretionary opportunities for INEC. Yet, the Senate handled it with a “let sleeping dogs lie” approach. The citizens have every reason to be as outraged as they currently are.”

Continue Reading

Trending