Politics
US ‘could provide “air cover” for a peacekeeping force in Ukraine’
The United States could provide ‘air cover’ to a peacekeeping force in Ukraine in return for access to rare earth and minerals, UK government sources believe, after the Trump administration dismissed Kyiv‘s request for troops to uphold a ceasefire.
The British government has been trying to lobby the United States to agree to send more air defence systems to Ukraine to help uphold any peace deal, as Donald Trump said he had begun talks with Vladimir Putin over the fate of Ukraine this week.
‘That’s their security guarantee,’ a senior government source told The Times, noting that the U.S. has not ruled out providing air cover. America was reportedly transferring Patriot air defence systems from storage in Israel to Ukraine last month.
Donald Trump has suggested that Ukraine could begin to compensate the United States for aid sent over the last three years with ‘like $500 billion worth of rare earth’. The deal was originally floated by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last year.
But questions remain around what such a deal could look like, and whether Kyiv could expect continued U.S. support in return for its precious elements. Amid European panic over peace talks between Trump and Putin, allies hope Ukrainian minerals could go some way to buying leverage for Ukraine.
In a devastating blow to NATO partners on Wednesday, Trump’s defence secretary said that Europe would have to provide the lion share of future aid to Kyiv, and ruled out sending American troops to help uphold a ceasefire if terms are agreed.
Britain and France were rumoured to be discussing sending troops to help keep the peace in Ukraine last month. But the government last week refused to ‘speculate about the future’, while reiterating support for Ukraine.

The U.S. Army test fires a Patriot missile (File photo)

Donald Trump says he has started talks with Putin to end the war in Ukraine
Pete Hegseth, Trump’s defence secretary, said on Wednesday that the United States would not deploy troops to Ukraine to uphold any peace deal with Russia – one of the key security guarantees requested by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
But treasury secretary Scott Bessent suggested that a mineral deal could be used as a ‘security shield’ for Ukraine after the war, saying that an increased ‘economic commitment’ to the country would invite ‘long-term’ American support.
Ukraine has some £12trn worth of natural resources, though many are found in the industrial heartlands in the east, currently occupied by Russia.
Mining analysts and economists say Ukraine currently has no commercially operational rare earth mines. The bulk of Ukraine’s coal deposits, which powered its steel industry before the war, are concentrated in the east and have been lost.
Many companies slowed or ceased operations at the start of the war, and restarting industry in a war-torn country will present a mammoth challenge for any companies willing to take the risk.
About 40% of Ukraine’s metal resources are now under Russian occupation, according to estimates by Ukrainian think-tanks We Build Ukraine and the National Institute of Strategic Studies, citing data up to the first half of 2024.
Since then, Russian troops have only continued to advance steadily in the eastern Donetsk region. In January, Ukraine closed its only coking coal mine outside the city of Pokrovsk, which Moscow’s forces are trying to capture.
Russia has occupied at least two Ukrainian lithium deposits during the war – one in Donetsk and another in the Zaporizhzhia region in the southeast. Kyiv still controls lithium deposits in the central Kyrovohrad region.

A Russian Air Force MiG-29S (File photo)

Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with Governor of the Bryansk region Alexander Bogomaz via a video link from his residence outside Moscow, Russia, February 13

The destroyed facilities of Azovstal Iron and Steel Works at the start of the invasion, in Mariupol, Ukraine May 22, 2022
Most of Ukraine’s rare minerals are located in Luhansk Oblast, Donetsk Oblast and Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. Large swathes of Luhansk and Donetsk, collectively known as the Donbas, were seized in 2014 and remain under Russian control.
In October last year, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) think tank assessed that Russian troops controlled 98.8 per cent of Luhansk. Around 60 per cent of Donetsk was assessed to be under Russian control in the same timeframe.
Russia’s advances to the south halt before Dnipropetrovsk, situated fortuitously around the Dnipro River. But the region continues to experience intense shelling.
Ukraine may see that a deal that ensures American investment in the country could go some way towards preventing another Russian invasion.
Kyiv has expressed in the past that any peace settlement that does not include hard military commitments – such as NATO membership or the deployment of peacekeeping troops – will just allow the Kremlin time to regroup and rearm for a fresh attack.
Although critics will fear that the U.S. and Russia are partitioning Ukraine to exploit its natural resources.
Zelenskyy said last month he would speak to the leaders of Britain and France to discuss a plan that would see troops from both countries stationed in Ukraine to held uphold and oversee a ceasefire agreement.
Sir Keir Starmer has vowed that the U.K. will play its ‘full part’ in helping support peace in Ukraine when peace terms are reached – although details remain unclear.

President Donald Trump meets with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at Trump Tower, Sept. 27, 2024, in New York

A Ukrainian rescuer working to extinguish a fire at the site of a drone and missile attack in Kyiv on February 12

Ukrainians ride a tank in the Kharkiv region, eastern Ukraine, 10 February 2025, amid the ongoing Russian invasion
During his call with Trump, Putin said that to end the war in Ukraine, the ‘root causes’ of the conflict needed to be resolved.
This was an apparent reference to security demands that Moscow put to NATO and Washington in late 2021, weeks before launching the war.
Those demands envisaged sweeping changes to Europe’s security architecture, including the withdrawal of US and NATO forces from former Soviet countries and eastern bloc members, including the Baltic states, Romania and Bulgaria, which are all NATO and EU members.
Russia also demanded a commitment from NATO that it would not offer membership to any other ex-Soviet nations, including Ukraine, or conduct military operations on former USSR territory.
The Kremlin, since invading, has ruled out the idea of swapping territory in Russia controlled by Ukraine for Ukrainian territory controlled by its army.
Moscow says that any agreement to end the conflict must reflect the ‘new realities on the ground,’ referring to its annexation of four southern and eastern Ukrainian territories in 2022, as well as its 2014 seizure of Crimea.
It has also ruled out direct talks with Zelensky, claiming that his presidential term ended last year. Under martial law imposed after the invasion, Zelensky remains leader and is internationally recognised as such.
Politics
Electoral Reform: Dino alleges senate’s plot to rig 2027 election
Former lawmaker, Dino Melaye Esq, has raised concerns over the Senate’s reported rejection of the electronic transmission of election results.
The move, according to Melaye, is a clear endorsement of election rigging and an indication of a sinister plan to rig the 2027 elections.
In a statement on Friday, the former lawmaker criticized the Senate’s decision, stating that it undermines the credibility of the electoral process.
The African Democratic Congress, ADC chieftain, also stated that the move opens the door for electoral manipulation and fraud.
He further warned that the rejection of electronic transmission of results is a step backwards for democracy in Nigeria.
Melaye called on lawmakers and citizens to stand up against “this blatant attempt to undermine the will of the people and ensure that future elections are free, fair, and transparent”.
Politics
Electoral Act: Nigerians have every reason to be mad at Senate – Ezekwesili
Former Minister of Education, Oby Ezekwesili, has said Nigerians have every reason to be mad at the Senate over the ongoing debate on e-transmission of election results.
Ezekwesili made this known on Friday when she featured in an interview on Arise Television’s ‘Morning Show’ monitored by DAILY POST.
DAILY POST reports that the Senate on Wednesday turned down a proposed change to Clause 60, Subsection 3, of the Electoral Amendment Bill that aimed to compel the electronic transmission of election results.
Reacting to the matter, Ezekwesili said, “The fundamental issue with the review of the Electoral Act is that the Senate retained the INEC 2022 Act, Section 60 Sub 5.
“This section became infamous for the loophole it provided INEC, causing Nigerians to lose trust. Since the law established that it wasn’t mandatory for INEC to transmit electoral results in real-time, there wasn’t much anyone could say.
“Citizens embraced the opportunity to reform the INEC Act, aiming to address ambiguity and discretionary opportunities for INEC. Yet, the Senate handled it with a “let sleeping dogs lie” approach. The citizens have every reason to be as outraged as they currently are.”
Politics
Electoral act: Senate’s action confirms Nigeria ‘fantastically corrupt’, ‘disgraced’ – Peter Obi
Former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, has condemned the Senate’s refusal to make electronic transmission of election results mandatory, saying the move further exposes Nigeria as a fantastically corrupt and disgraced country.
Obi expressed his views in a statement shared on X on Friday, where he accused lawmakers of deliberately weakening Nigeria’s democratic process ahead of the 2027 general elections.
He explained that his reaction came after a brief pause to mourn victims of a deadly tragedy in Kwara State, where over 150 people reportedly lost their lives.
“Let us first pray for the souls of the innocent Nigerians lost in Kwara. That painful incident is why I delayed responding to the shameful development surrounding our electoral system,” he wrote.
Describing the Senate’s decision as intentional and dangerous, Obi said rejecting mandatory electronic transmission was not a simple oversight but a calculated attempt to block transparency.
“The Senate’s open rejection of electronic transmission of results is an unforgivable act of electoral manipulation ahead of 2027,” he said.
According to him, the action strikes at the heart of democracy and raises serious questions about the true purpose of governance in Nigeria.
“This failure to pass a clear safeguard is a direct attack on our democracy. By refusing these transparency measures, the foundation of credible elections is being destroyed. One must ask whether government exists to ensure justice and order or to deliberately create chaos for the benefit of a few.”
The former Anambra State governor linked the post-election controversies of the 2023 general elections to the failure to fully deploy electronic transmission of results, insisting that Nigerians were misled with claims of technical failures.
“
The confusion, disputes and manipulation that followed the 2023 elections were largely due to the refusal to fully implement electronic transmission,” he said.
He added that the so-called system glitch never truly existed.
Obi compared Nigeria’s electoral process with those of other African countries that have embraced technology to improve credibility, lamenting that Nigeria continues to fall behind.
“Many African nations now use electronic transmission to strengthen their democracy. Yet Nigeria, which calls itself the giant of Africa, is moving backwards and dragging the continent along.”
He criticised Nigeria’s leadership class, saying the country’s problems persist not because of a lack of ideas but because of deliberate resistance to meaningful reform.
“We keep organising conferences and writing policy papers about Nigeria’s challenges. But the truth is that the leaders and elite are the real problem. Our refusal to change is pushing the nation backwards into a primitive system of governance.”
Warning of the dangers ahead, Obi said rejecting electronic transmission creates room for confusion and disorder that only serves the interests of a small group.
He also recalled past remarks by foreign leaders who described Nigeria as corrupt, arguing that actions like this continue to justify those statements.
“When a former UK Prime Minister described Nigeria as ‘fantastically corrupt,’ we were offended. When former US President Donald Trump called us a ‘disgraced nation,’ we were angry. But our continued resistance to transparency keeps proving them right.”
Obi warned that Nigerians should not accept a repeat of the electoral irregularities witnessed in 2023.
“Let there be no mistake. The criminality seen in 2023 must not be tolerated in 2027.”
He urged citizens to be ready to defend democracy through lawful and decisive means, while also calling on the international community to closely monitor developments in Nigeria’s electoral process.
“The international community must pay attention to the groundwork being laid for future electoral manipulation, which threatens our democracy and development,” Obi stated.
He concluded by expressing hope that change is still possible if Nigerians take collective responsibility.
“A new Nigeria is possible but only if we all rise and fight for it.”
-
Business1 year ago
US court acquits Air Peace boss, slams Mayfield $4000 fine
-
Trending1 year agoNYA demands release of ‘abducted’ Imo chairman, preaches good governance
-
Politics1 year agoMexico’s new president causes concern just weeks before the US elections
-
Politics1 year agoPutin invites 20 world leaders
-
Politics1 year agoRussia bans imports of agro-products from Kazakhstan after refusal to join BRICS
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky falls ill in police custody, rushed to hospital
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky transferred from Immigration to FCID, spends night behind bars
-
Education1 year ago
GOVERNOR FUBARA APPOINTS COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR KEN SARO-WIWA POLYTECHNIC BORI
