Politics
G20 Summit: Brazil’s billionaire tax plan faces pushback
The G20 summit in Rio aims to build consensus on taxing the super-rich for climate action and poverty relief. But as geopolitical issues take priority, President Lula may struggle to quell skepticism over the proposal.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, hosting the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro from Monday, will try to progress plans to tax the world’s richest billionaires, who often use complex loopholes to avoid tax.
At a July meeting of G20 finance ministers in Rio, the world’s wealthiest nations agreed to start a “dialogue on fair and progressive taxation, including of ultra-high-net-worth individuals,” despite fierce resistance from the United States and within Germany’s now collapsed coalition government.
While the world’s growing geopolitical issues — the Ukraine and Gaza conflicts, the prospect of a second Trump term in the US and China trade — are expected to dominate the two-day summit, Lula hopes to move the wealth tax plan forward as the money raised from billionaires will help boost other pressing global issues.

Campaigners have called for years for greater scrutiny over how the wealthy avoid taxes
© Fabrice Coffrini/AFP
Advocates say new tax would cause little pain
Devised by French economist Gabriel Zucman, the plan would introduce an annual tax of 2% on the total net worth of the uberwealthy — not just their annual income. This would include real estate assets, corporate shareholdings and other investments. Zucman estimates that the top 0.01% of the population pay an effective tax rate of just 0.3% of their wealth.
The new levy could raise up to $250 billion (€237 billion) a year from the nearly 2,800 billionaires globally, who have a combined net worth estimated at some $13.5 trillion, according to the Forbes Richest World’s Billionaires List. The funds raised would be used to tackle growing global inequalities, especially among heavily indebted low-income countries, including many in Africa.
“The taxation of high net-worth individuals is very important as it could be a source for funding initiatives that fight hunger and poverty, and also tackle climate change,” Tomas Marques, a research fellow at Hamburg’s GIGA Institute for Latin American Studies, told DW.
Developing nations, who many scientists say are being disproportionately affected by climate change, have for years demanded funding to offset its worst impacts. Success stories include World Bank and Green Climate Fund support for India’s bid to boost solar power capacity and Brazil’s Amazon Fund, aimed at reducing deforestation, which is part-funded by Norway and Germany.
Skepticism over G20 spending plans
While there may be broad public support for new taxes on the ultra-wealthy, the rise of national populism in many G20 countries is increasing scrutiny about how public money is spent, amid concerns that international aid and development funds could be better deployed at home.
“Most of the G20 countries are having a hard time balancing their budgets,” Maria Antonieta Del Tedesco Lins, an economist and associate professor at the University of Sao Paulo, told DW. “While extra taxes would help, it’s very hard to juggle national pressures with new international or multilateral obligations.”
Monday’s opening ceremony in Rio will launch the Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty, an initiative under Brazil’s G20 presidency that seeks to accelerate efforts in the fight against poverty and a lack of food by 2030.
The Brazilian government is also the principal backer of the proposed tax on the ultrawealthy, along with France, Spain and South Africa. Despite this support, the lower house of Brazil’s parliament, the Chamber of Deputies, last month rejected plans for an additional domestic levy on those with large fortunes.
“It’s a shame because Brazil could benefit a lot [from this tax] because we are a very unequal country. If there was an international consensus [on taxing the superrich] it could help negotiations in the Brazilian Congress,” said Lins, who took part in a G20 academic engagement group ahead of the summit.
In Brazil, as in the rest of the world, the wealthy often shield their wealth from tax authorities by creating shell companies in countries with low or zero taxes, taking advantage of banking secrecy laws and forming trusts and charitable foundations, which offer generous tax breaks.
US spurns wealth-tax proposal
While China’s and India’s positions on the new tax are ambiguous, Washington remains firmly opposed. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told the Wall Street Journal in May that the measure was “something we can’t sign on to.”
President-elect Donald Trump has yet to comment on the proposal but is unlikely to back hiking taxes on the uber-rich. His first term was marked by large tax cuts — which benefited wealthy individuals and corporations the most. But during his short-lived run for the White House in 2000, he did promise to cut the national debt by levying a one-time 14.25% tax on the wealthy.
Lula then faces tough odds in making any meaningful progress during the two-day summit, especially as many critical geopolitical issues, as well as Brazil’s proposal to improve global governance will also dominate the talks.
“Lula is a great negotiator,” Marques said. “He bills himself as a bridge builder between the Global South and Global North. But I don’t know how he can reach a consensus around this very sensitive topic.”

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva is a shrewed negotiator, who is determined to push ahead with higher taxes on billionaires
© Erica Martin/TheNEWS2/picture alliance
Wealth tax — a boon for Africa
Better representation at G20 for Africa is now critical, as the continent seeks to benefit from any new tax plan, through the receipt of poverty and climate alleviation funds. The African Union, the regional bloc of 55 African countries, will be attending the Rio summit for the first time, after being admitted as a full G20 member in August.
Next year, South Africa will take over the rotating G20 presidency — the fourth consecutive leadership of the bloc from the Global South, after Indonesia, India, and Brazil. The role will give the country and Africa as a whole further opportunities to shape global policies and advocate for the continent’s interests.
“African countries have been underrepresented in the G20 despite the continent’s importance globally,” Marques, who is in Rio for the summit, told DW. “But things are changing, and the African Union is now starting to have some influence on policymaking.”
Edited by: Uwe Hessler
Author: Nik Martin
Politics
Electoral Reform: Dino alleges senate’s plot to rig 2027 election
Former lawmaker, Dino Melaye Esq, has raised concerns over the Senate’s reported rejection of the electronic transmission of election results.
The move, according to Melaye, is a clear endorsement of election rigging and an indication of a sinister plan to rig the 2027 elections.
In a statement on Friday, the former lawmaker criticized the Senate’s decision, stating that it undermines the credibility of the electoral process.
The African Democratic Congress, ADC chieftain, also stated that the move opens the door for electoral manipulation and fraud.
He further warned that the rejection of electronic transmission of results is a step backwards for democracy in Nigeria.
Melaye called on lawmakers and citizens to stand up against “this blatant attempt to undermine the will of the people and ensure that future elections are free, fair, and transparent”.
Politics
Electoral Act: Nigerians have every reason to be mad at Senate – Ezekwesili
Former Minister of Education, Oby Ezekwesili, has said Nigerians have every reason to be mad at the Senate over the ongoing debate on e-transmission of election results.
Ezekwesili made this known on Friday when she featured in an interview on Arise Television’s ‘Morning Show’ monitored by DAILY POST.
DAILY POST reports that the Senate on Wednesday turned down a proposed change to Clause 60, Subsection 3, of the Electoral Amendment Bill that aimed to compel the electronic transmission of election results.
Reacting to the matter, Ezekwesili said, “The fundamental issue with the review of the Electoral Act is that the Senate retained the INEC 2022 Act, Section 60 Sub 5.
“This section became infamous for the loophole it provided INEC, causing Nigerians to lose trust. Since the law established that it wasn’t mandatory for INEC to transmit electoral results in real-time, there wasn’t much anyone could say.
“Citizens embraced the opportunity to reform the INEC Act, aiming to address ambiguity and discretionary opportunities for INEC. Yet, the Senate handled it with a “let sleeping dogs lie” approach. The citizens have every reason to be as outraged as they currently are.”
Politics
Electoral act: Senate’s action confirms Nigeria ‘fantastically corrupt’, ‘disgraced’ – Peter Obi
Former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, has condemned the Senate’s refusal to make electronic transmission of election results mandatory, saying the move further exposes Nigeria as a fantastically corrupt and disgraced country.
Obi expressed his views in a statement shared on X on Friday, where he accused lawmakers of deliberately weakening Nigeria’s democratic process ahead of the 2027 general elections.
He explained that his reaction came after a brief pause to mourn victims of a deadly tragedy in Kwara State, where over 150 people reportedly lost their lives.
“Let us first pray for the souls of the innocent Nigerians lost in Kwara. That painful incident is why I delayed responding to the shameful development surrounding our electoral system,” he wrote.
Describing the Senate’s decision as intentional and dangerous, Obi said rejecting mandatory electronic transmission was not a simple oversight but a calculated attempt to block transparency.
“The Senate’s open rejection of electronic transmission of results is an unforgivable act of electoral manipulation ahead of 2027,” he said.
According to him, the action strikes at the heart of democracy and raises serious questions about the true purpose of governance in Nigeria.
“This failure to pass a clear safeguard is a direct attack on our democracy. By refusing these transparency measures, the foundation of credible elections is being destroyed. One must ask whether government exists to ensure justice and order or to deliberately create chaos for the benefit of a few.”
The former Anambra State governor linked the post-election controversies of the 2023 general elections to the failure to fully deploy electronic transmission of results, insisting that Nigerians were misled with claims of technical failures.
“
The confusion, disputes and manipulation that followed the 2023 elections were largely due to the refusal to fully implement electronic transmission,” he said.
He added that the so-called system glitch never truly existed.
Obi compared Nigeria’s electoral process with those of other African countries that have embraced technology to improve credibility, lamenting that Nigeria continues to fall behind.
“Many African nations now use electronic transmission to strengthen their democracy. Yet Nigeria, which calls itself the giant of Africa, is moving backwards and dragging the continent along.”
He criticised Nigeria’s leadership class, saying the country’s problems persist not because of a lack of ideas but because of deliberate resistance to meaningful reform.
“We keep organising conferences and writing policy papers about Nigeria’s challenges. But the truth is that the leaders and elite are the real problem. Our refusal to change is pushing the nation backwards into a primitive system of governance.”
Warning of the dangers ahead, Obi said rejecting electronic transmission creates room for confusion and disorder that only serves the interests of a small group.
He also recalled past remarks by foreign leaders who described Nigeria as corrupt, arguing that actions like this continue to justify those statements.
“When a former UK Prime Minister described Nigeria as ‘fantastically corrupt,’ we were offended. When former US President Donald Trump called us a ‘disgraced nation,’ we were angry. But our continued resistance to transparency keeps proving them right.”
Obi warned that Nigerians should not accept a repeat of the electoral irregularities witnessed in 2023.
“Let there be no mistake. The criminality seen in 2023 must not be tolerated in 2027.”
He urged citizens to be ready to defend democracy through lawful and decisive means, while also calling on the international community to closely monitor developments in Nigeria’s electoral process.
“The international community must pay attention to the groundwork being laid for future electoral manipulation, which threatens our democracy and development,” Obi stated.
He concluded by expressing hope that change is still possible if Nigerians take collective responsibility.
“A new Nigeria is possible but only if we all rise and fight for it.”
-
Business1 year ago
US court acquits Air Peace boss, slams Mayfield $4000 fine
-
Trending1 year agoNYA demands release of ‘abducted’ Imo chairman, preaches good governance
-
Politics1 year agoMexico’s new president causes concern just weeks before the US elections
-
Politics1 year agoPutin invites 20 world leaders
-
Politics1 year agoRussia bans imports of agro-products from Kazakhstan after refusal to join BRICS
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky falls ill in police custody, rushed to hospital
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky transferred from Immigration to FCID, spends night behind bars
-
Education1 year ago
GOVERNOR FUBARA APPOINTS COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR KEN SARO-WIWA POLYTECHNIC BORI
