Connect with us

Politics

REGIONALISM AND PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT ARE NOT SOLUTIONS TO NIGERIA’S PROBLEM – EMIR OF KANO SANUSI

Published

on

Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II has said that regionalism and parliamentary system of government are not solutions to Nigeria’s problem.

Sanusi who said this in an interview with Vanguard, questioned the necessity of a bicameral legislature and the rationale behind appointing ministers from every state, even when not required. He noted that it contributes to bureaucratic inefficiencies and does not necessarily serve the best interests of the nation.

He also criticized the federal government’s interference in state matters, particularly regarding traditional and chieftaincy affairs. Emir Sanusi also stressed the importance of upholding constitutional principles and maintaining a clear separation of powers to ensure accountable governance.

The monarch who noted that regionalism will exacerbate the issues in the country rather than resolve existing tensions, also called for a more cohesive national identity and governance structure that promotes unity and accountability.

He said;

“I think there are several things we can do to address those structures because at the end of the day if you allow the state governors to run, the thing with devolution is we have 36 states, if only half of the governors are good, at least half of Nigeria has a good government. There is too much power at the centre, too much of the resources. The centre does not do primary education or primary healthcare, and that is where the vast majority of Nigerians are. Shouldn’t those resources come to the state? Instead of everybody going to Abuja, what is happening in Abuja? There are several issues that we need to look at. And also simple constitutionalism and federalism, just even the respect of separation of separation of power. If you take the example of what is happening in Kano today, chieftaincy matter is 100 per cent a state matter.

“We had a parliamentary system in the First Republic. What happened? At the end of the day, it is the humans that operate the system. People talk about regions. Initially, the regions we had in this country were North, East, and West, and then it became NorthEast and MidWest. Where did the creation called six geo-political zones come from historically? We can keep dividing and subdividing this country and thinking of ourselves, but are we really honest? Are these regions?

“If you go to the Niger Delta, since when did the Itsekiri stop fighting wars against the Ijaw? Since when did we become homogeneous?

“It was the Sokoto Jihad that brought us together. From the Sokoto caliphate, we became Northerners, from Northerners, we became Nigerians. When I was in King’s College, I grew up under Yakubu Gowon in a country where Nigerians were thinking like Nigerians. What happened? Political leadership is the one that exploits regional and ethnic identities as part of the struggle for political office.

“When they get there, they all sit together. If you look at the president’s cabinet, what do you have? You have everybody from every state. You have Christians, you have Muslims, you have Northerners and Southerners. Why are they not fighting one another in there? The elites are irresponsible.

“Don’t think that pandering to these elites by saying the solution is going to a regional system of government. How do we go regional? In Yorubaland, there are Ijebu, Ekiti, Ijesha, Owo, and Egba since when did they become one? Right there between Ife and Modakeke, they were killing each other. It is not about that. It is not a solution. How many parts are you going to slice this country to get a homogenous country? How? With all the intermarriages and education, I am not sure that is a solution, and I think people have this dream that can only be sold by blocking out history.

“We had a regional system in the First Republic. How did it end? We had a parliamentary system in the First Republic. How did it end? I am not talking about the coup; I am talking about the crisis that led to the coup. Before Nzeogu, forget Ironsi. How was the system before they came? Is there any documentary evidence that that system was fundamentally better than what we have?

“We can’t shift responsibilities away from human beings, the people who are responsible for operating the system. If you go to the Senate and the House of Representatives, and you are there for 16 years and you have never passed a bill, you don’t even know that your job is to be a lawmaker.”

Politics

Dele Momodu alleges dual power structure in Nigeria, questions Wike’s rising influence

Published

on

Renowned publisher and former presidential aspirant, Dele Momodu has raised concerns over what he described as the outsized influence of Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike within President Bola Tinubu’s administration—suggesting that Nigeria is operating under an unofficial dual leadership.

Speaking on Channels Television’s The Morning Brief on Wednesday, Momodu criticised President Tinubu’s apparent endorsement of Wike’s political style, following the commissioning of the newly refurbished International Conference Centre in Abuja, which has been renamed in Tinubu’s honour.

Momodu remarked, “Right now, it’s looking like we have two presidents in Nigeria. Wike can do anything. Even President Tinubu, who has controlled Lagos since 1999, was never this audacious.”

The comment came in response to Tinubu’s public praise of Wike during the inauguration ceremony, where the president urged the minister to ignore “busybodies and naysayers.”

Momodu strongly disagreed with Tinubu’s choice of words, stating, “I listened to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria calling fellow Nigerians ‘busybodies.’ You interpreted it as ‘naysayers’—‘naysayers’ is still far better. Who is a bystander in his own country because of one man?”

He also took a swipe at the scale of the conference centre project, questioning the rationale behind celebrating what he called “a ₦30 billion launch” with such fanfare.

“If you were in Wike’s shoes, you would dance more than he danced yesterday. I saw the expressions on the faces of the audience—they looked befuddled, like, ‘what is our country turning into?’” he added.

Continue Reading

Politics

Obi left more debt for Anambra than any governor before him – Reno Omokri

Published

on



‎Former presidential aide Reno Omokri has said that the claim of former governor of Anambra state, Mr Peter Obi, in a recent interview with Rufai (A journalist) to have left about 150million dollars and 36billion Naira is dishonest and misleading.

‎According to Reno, Peter Obi left a debt of 127billion Naira that was due immediately after his successor Willie Obiano took over,

‎He said that he debt came from unpaid money to contractors who were hired by Obi Administration but couldn’t finish their works before his tenure of office expired. Also he said Obi hired new staff at the last minute and their salaries will be paid by the new administration. He said more of the debt also came from approvals Obi made when he was about to leave office.

‎Peter Obi mentioned in his interview with Rufai that the money he left was able to settle contractors that he hired when they finish their work, that he didn’t pay them complete because they haven’t completed their work before he left office.

‎We might need Willie Obiano to settle this argument.

Continue Reading

Politics

Stop supporting enemies of Nnamdi Kanu – Ohanaeze advises IPOB

Published

on

Apex Igbo socio-cultural organization, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, has advised the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, to uphold a position of neutrality and refrain from unwarranted interference in the activities of the body.

Ohanaeze said such encroachment is not only disconcerting but also unequivocally unacceptable and deserving of stern condemnation.

The pan-Igbo group stated that it’s troubling to observe that IPOB is being misled by individuals who are, regrettably, benefitting from the prolonged and unjust incarceration of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

According to Ohanaeze, it is evident that certain elements within IPOB have found themselves cornered, defending those who are complicit in the very detention of the IPOB leader.

In a joint statement issued on Tuesday by the factional Deputy President-General, Mazi Okechukwu Isiguzoro, and Thompson Ohia, Spokesperson, the group extended its support to individuals who are not genuine members of the organization but are closely allied with its leadership, thereby distorting the original mission.

The statement read: “We cannot overlook the shameful alignment of IPOB with certain Igbo leaders who seem intent on exploiting Mazi Nnamdi Kanu as a scapegoat for their own ulterior motives. The very individuals responsible for the violence against IPOB members are those whom IPOB now chooses to defend.

“This contradiction not only undermines the integrity of our collective struggle but also diminishes our shared vision for justice and equity.

“Ohanaeze Ndigbo would like to publicly inform the general populace of attempts to manipulate IPOB as a tool for blackmailing the leadership of our organization. We will resolutely decline to engage in any media disputes or controversies with the leadership of IPOB, particularly as they have been led to believe that attacking Ohanaeze Ndigbo will serve their cause.

“We challenge IPOB to exercise caution in its choices, for the individuals they currently support are, in fact, the enemies of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. These individuals are more invested in taking photographs alongside him in court rather than genuinely advocating for avenues that would facilitate his release.

“The ongoing violence against innocent youths, who are unjustly branded as IPOB terrorists, is a direct consequence of this misalignment. At this pivotal moment, we implore IPOB and all stakeholders within our community to reassess their alliances and redirect their efforts towards a united front against our true adversaries.

“Let us collectively strive for a future marked by clarity of purpose, unyielding commitment to justice, and profound respect for the sanctity of our shared heritage.”

Apex Igbo socio-cultural organization, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, has advised the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, to uphold a position of neutrality and refrain from unwarranted interference in the activities of the body.

Ohanaeze said such encroachment is not only disconcerting but also unequivocally unacceptable and deserving of stern condemnation.

The pan-Igbo group stated that it’s troubling to observe that IPOB is being misled by individuals who are, regrettably, benefitting from the prolonged and unjust incarceration of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

According to Ohanaeze, it is evident that certain elements within IPOB have found themselves cornered, defending those who are complicit in the very detention of the IPOB leader.

In a joint statement issued on Tuesday by the factional Deputy President-General, Mazi Okechukwu Isiguzoro, and Thompson Ohia, Spokesperson, the group extended its support to individuals who are not genuine members of the organization but are closely allied with its leadership, thereby distorting the original mission.

The statement read: “We cannot overlook the shameful alignment of IPOB with certain Igbo leaders who seem intent on exploiting Mazi Nnamdi Kanu as a scapegoat for their own ulterior motives. The very individuals responsible for the violence against IPOB members are those whom IPOB now chooses to defend.

“This contradiction not only undermines the integrity of our collective struggle but also diminishes our shared vision for justice and equity.

“Ohanaeze Ndigbo would like to publicly inform the general populace of attempts to manipulate IPOB as a tool for blackmailing the leadership of our organization. We will resolutely decline to engage in any media disputes or controversies with the leadership of IPOB, particularly as they have been led to believe that attacking Ohanaeze Ndigbo will serve their cause.

“We challenge IPOB to exercise caution in its choices, for the individuals they currently support are, in fact, the enemies of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. These individuals are more invested in taking photographs alongside him in court rather than genuinely advocating for avenues that would facilitate his release.

“The ongoing violence against innocent youths, who are unjustly branded as IPOB terrorists, is a direct consequence of this misalignment. At this pivotal moment, we implore IPOB and all stakeholders within our community to reassess their alliances and redirect their efforts towards a united front against our true adversaries.

“Let us collectively strive for a future marked by clarity of purpose, unyielding commitment to justice, and profound respect for the sanctity of our shared heritage.”

Continue Reading

Trending