Connect with us

News

I have an uncommon relationship with Obasanjo – Charly Boy

Published

on

Human rights activist, Charly Boy, says he has an uncommon relationship with former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

Charly Boy said this in a statement posted on his official X handle, stressing that the relationship is built on mutual respect, understanding, and shared concern for Nigeria’s future.

The Maverick entertainer, widely known for his rebellious persona and outspoken criticism of the government, said that many Nigerians initially found his closeness to Obasanjo surprising.

“People wondered how someone who constantly challenges authority could be so connected to a former head of state. But life is not always black and white. Sometimes respect and understanding build bridges where people least expect,” he wrote.

According to him, the former head of state recognized qualities in him that others often overlooked, courage, consistency, and a commitment to truth regardless of circumstances.

In return, Charly Boy said he saw beyond Obasanjo’s military background and presidential title, acknowledging him as an elder who had endured war, leadership pressures, and national challenges yet remained resilient.

He added that their relationship is not one of publicity or noise but of quiet understanding, stating that conversations between them often revolve around Nigeria’s pressing issues, marked by debate and disagreement but never bitterness.

“We may argue, we may disagree, but respect is always intact,” Charly Boy emphasized.

News

Court dismisses ICPC’s suit against N941. 9m for being unjusticeable, incompetent

Published

on

Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a suit brought by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, ICPC, against N941, 994, 079 for reasons of forfeiture of the money to the federal government.

The angry Judge threw away the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/156/2026 in FRN Vs N941, 994, 079 on ground of being grossly incompetent and non justiceable.

ICPC had through its counsel, Mr Hamza Sani sought to move an ex-parte application praying for forfeiture of the huge sum to the federal government, having been allegedly found to be proceed of unlawful transaction in a bank account.

As the case was called and ICPC through its lawyer announced appearance as the applicant on behalf of the federal government, Justice Nyako who was piqued by the development challenged the lawyer on the competence of the suit.

As the ICPC counsel was struggling to get an answer, the Judge further challenged him to explain to the court whether the suit against an ordinary money was justiciable.

In the drama that ensued, the Judge ordered the lawyer to go to ICPC’s counterpart, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to learn how to couch forfeiture suit before a court of record.

While faulting ICPC’s adopted procedures in the incompetent ways and manners the instant suit was couched, the Judge lectured the lawyer that such ex-parte application must be against a justiceable person.

“Counsel let ICPC borrow a leave from EFCC. Let your organization know that this kind of suit must be filed in the name of its Chairman.

“Secondly, let your organization learn that the name of the person in whose bank account, the alleged illicit fund was found must accompany the money in the motion.

“Go back and put your house in order. I cannot make an order against a non justiceable person as in this your incompetent motion.

“This kind of suit must be filed in the name of ICPC Chairman. The name of the person in whose bank account the money was found must also be reflected, it must be put in the motion before it can become competent in law.

“I don’t engage in academic or futile exercise. Court orders are not made in vain. They are made against justiceable persons so that they can be enforced.

Justice Nyako blocked arguing the application until the ICPC files a competent one known to law and its procedures.

 

Continue Reading

News

IGP slams murder, unlawful firearms possession charge on Osun political thugs

Published

on

The Inspector General of Police, IGP, on Monday at the Federal High Court in Abuja put four Osogbo-based suspected political thugs on trial on two counts of alleged murder and unlawful firearms possession.

The four defendants, namely, Adejare Waliyu, Kilanko Ismaila Damilare, Kehinde Adeola and Muheeb Taoheeb, were arraigned before Justice Binta Fatima Nyako for allegedly shooting one Sheriff to death during a political crisis.

Counsel to the IGP, Mr Adeniyi Oyeyemi, in the charges, accused Adejare Waliyu of unlawful possession of sophisticated prohibited pump action rifle contrary to Section 27 of the Firearms Act.

In count two , the four defendants were accused of killing one Sheriff with the unlawfully possessed pump action rifle contrary to Section 319 of the Criminal Code Act, 2004.

They were said to have committed the alleged crimes between August 26 and November 28, 2022, in Osun State.

However, when the charge was read to them, the four accused persons pleaded not guilty.

Although the IGP lawyer requested for a date to commence trial of the defendants, counsel to the accused persons, Mr Okon Ita, moved an application in which he pleaded with the judge to transfer the trial of his clients to Osogbo, where the alleged murder was committed.

Among others, the lawyer argued that the alleged offences were committed in Osogbo and that all witnesses listed to testify for the prosecution are all resident in the Osun State capital.

He admitted that the Federal High Court is one in any part of Nigeria but submitted that for administrative sake and in the interest of justice for the defendants, it would be safer for the trial to hold where the alleged crimes were committed.

The IGP raised objections against the request but Justice Binta Nyako saw merit in the argument of the accused persons and granted same.

The judge ordered that the case be transferred to the Osogbo Division of the Federal High Court for administrative convenience and being the place where the alleged murder was carried out.

Pending the transfer of the case marked FHC/ABJ/CR/655/2022, Justice Nyako ordered that the accused persons should remain in the custody of the Force Headquarters in Abuja.

Continue Reading

News

EXCLUSIVE: Tension in Nigerian Judiciary as NJC begins probe of top Judges

Published

on

Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, Chief Justice of Nigeria and Chairperson, National Judicial Council (NJC)

CJN Kekere-Ekun, NJC chairperson, had pledged sweeping reforms aimed at promoting judicial excellence, transparency, and effective administration of justice.

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has commenced a discreet but far-reaching investigation into some highly placed judges in the country, including heads of courts, insiders at the council have told Ekwutosblog.

The NJC is the constitutional body responsible for appointing, promoting and disciplining judicial officers in Nigeria.

The 24-member council, led by the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Kudirat kekere – Ekun, derives its authority from Paragraph 20 of Part One of the Third Schedule to the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

Our sources said the ongoing “extraordinary investigation” was triggered by a wave of “damning and disturbing petitions” filed against some unnamed “very senior judicial officers.”

“The allegation against one of the senior judges is so grave that Chief Justice Kekere-Ekun has ordered an urgent probe to identify culpable individuals and cleanse the judiciary,” an official familiar with the development told Ekwutosblog, adding that the inquiry is being handled with strict confidentiality and is known only to a handful of insiders.

“I can tell you that the NJC has, in recent times, received several petitions and complaints alleging serious and shocking misconduct, forgery, age falsification and false asset declarations,” the source said. “Deeply disturbed by the weight of the allegations, the CJN is mobilising the NJC for urgent administrative action. She does not want these claims to further erode public confidence in the judiciary.”

Our sources declined to disclose the identities of the judges under investigation or the individuals who filed the petitions, saying they were not authorised to discuss the matter publicly.

When contacted, Tobi Soniyi, Senior Special Assistant to the CJN on Media, directed all enquiries to the NJC, saying he had not been briefed on the issue.

The NJC’s Deputy Director (Information), Kemi Babalola-Ogedengbe, also told Ekwutosblog she was unaware of any such probe.

Justice Kekere-Ekun had, in September 2025, during a ceremony marking the commencement of the 2025/2026 legal year, pledged w – reforms-aimed at promoting judicial excellence, transparency and effective justice administration.

Continue Reading

Trending